5

I have a friend with a bright white cat. Photographs of this cat outdoors in direct sunlight feature either a glowing white blob or very underexposed surroundings, depending on what the point-and-shoot camera decided to meter on. I'm currently living far from said friend and cat, was considering sending an extra polarizer that I have sitting around, but don't have a similar test subject handy. Can anyone enlighten me as to how much, if at all, a polarizer will affect light reflecting from white fur? I should also mention that this is sleek, surface-like fur, not the puffball kind, which is why I think there's any chance of it working at all...

  • Not what the OP asked, but HDR might work if the cat is slow. – Wirewrap May 5 '15 at 13:32
2

Using a polarization filter does actually have an effect on fur. You can see an example in this article: How to Photograph Your Dog: 9 – Polarizers for Perfect Pet Portraits

However, the effect doesn't help your case at all.

What you would need would be to reduce the reflected light from the white fur while affecting the rest of the scene less. The polarizing filter will instead leave some reflected light from the fur unaffected, while reducing most everything else by 50%. You get the exact opposite of what you need.

  • Good link, thanks! The post actually shows that the filter does cut glare from the sheen of the coat, although the photos have been adjusted so that the result is overall lighter. This tells me that it could be worth sending a filter to mess around with, anyway. – junkyardsparkle May 5 '15 at 23:16
2

There are two components to the light being reflected off the fur. The predominant one is likely diffuse scattering. A polarizer won't help with that. There may be some more "reflection" looking sheen, especially if the light is coming from somewhat behind the cat. That probably is polarized, so a polarizing filter should be able to accentuate or attenuate it, depending on how the filter is rotated.

However, the fundamental problem is a small bright thing in a large and much darker picture. That's not going to get exposed properly by the automatic algorithms in most cameras. One way or another, you have to expose so that the brightest part of the cat doesn't saturate the sensor. Yes, the surrounding scene will then seem darker, but this is quite fixable with non-linear brightening in post-processing. A logarithmic sloshing towards the bright end usually works well for scenes with high contrast, but only if the information was properly captured (the bright parts aren't blown).

There are several ways with most cameras to expose so that the bright parts aren't blown. You can use center spot metering, push the button partway with the cat in center (this freezes the exposure), then frame as desired and snap by pushing the button all the way. Some cameras have a mode that looks at many spots and exposes for the brightest. Or you can use the brute force method and just set the automatic exposure compensation to -2 or something. Just don't forget to set it back when you're done photographing the cat.

  • Yes, it's this near-specular sheen component that I'm specifically hoping to cut, since it confuses the camera much more than diffuse white, and doesn't make for great pictures regardless of exposure... – junkyardsparkle May 6 '15 at 0:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.