I just got a used Nikon 300mm f/4 AF (the older, non-AF-S version), and unmounted, when set to f/4, the aperture blades are still slightly visible (you can push the aperture lever on the lens a bit to make the aperture fully wide open, but when let go, it stops down slightly). As you stop the lens down by turning the aperture ring, the blades continue to stop down as expected. There is no oil or other defect on the blades themselves that I can see, and they appear to open and close smoothly. This differs from my other lenses with an aperture ring in that when set wide open, there is no slack or play in the lever to make it more wide open.

When mounted on a camera, it appears that wide open at f/4, the exposure is correct, at f/5.6, it is about 1/3 stop over exposed, and from f/8-f/32 it is about 1 stop over exposed.

I took a series of photos at each aperture with exposure compensation set to 0, then did the series again with EC applied to get the histograms to match. When mounted, the aperture blades appear to be fully retracted (they cannot be seen), and triggering DOF Preview when set to f/4 shows no aperture movement (it remains wide open), which is as it should be. I did this test on both a D700 and D300 in aperture priority mode, with fixed ISO (auto ISO off), 0 exposure compensation, attached to a tripod, pointed at an empty wall (I first noticed the issue outside in the park). I compared to another lens (50mm f/1.4) at the same apertures shot at same wall, and all of its exposures matched the exposure from the 300mm at f/4.

Any ideas on what the problem might be, and what it would take to fix (other than using exposure compensation when stopped down)? Since the only thing mechanically that seems out of place is the somewhat loose aperture linkage lever, I assume a spring might be stretched or weak and causing the problem? None of my other lenses have this issue, so it's not the camera bodies. Thanks!

[Edit] One additional bit of info after some further checking - when unmounted, and stopped down to f/32, then slowly brought back to bigger apertures, the control lever seems to stick at the closed down position until about f/11, then it starts to move again, but this is purely in the lever mechanism itself, not due to the aperture blades. Worth trying to remove the lens mount myself to investigate?

  • \$\begingroup\$ If the lever sticking when moving from f/32 back to larger apertures was the problem, you would be getting underexposures rather than overexposures. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Nov 17, 2014 at 0:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ No. If something is sticky in the aperture mechanisms, you can only get overexposure. This is because metering is done at full aperture, and at exposure time the aperture blades have to close very fast. If they are not fast enough, you overexpose. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 23, 2014 at 15:51

1 Answer 1


No! Take it to the repair shop. Something like that would probably cost about $100 to get repaired (get an estimate to verify). It really could be a multitude of issues and pulling apart the lens when you are not a trained expert isn't going to give you answers you're looking for.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.