Say I want to take a landscape-type photograph of some large object in the distant (focus at infinity); for instance a mountain range at the horizon, or even the moon. Suppose no closer objects appear in the picture and that the lighting is generous. Will there be a noticeable difference between:
- wide aperture, say f/1.4, fast shutter speed
- narrow aperture, say f/16, slow shutter speed
(same ISO for each & shutter speed suitably adjusted so that both pictures appear roughly as bright)
If so, which would be more advisable? Thank you to anyone who replies.