Can anyone tell me what the base ISO is of a Canon 5D MK III?

I was reading this great piece on ETTR (1) and (2) and it repeatedly mentions how important shooting at Base ISO is when using ETTR. I understand his reasoning, but I can't seem to find a dependable resource that tells me what my camera's native ISO is.

There is a lot of conjecture and answers ranging from 100 - 640.

  • \$\begingroup\$ I have a Canon 5D3 and find that the blinkies and LV histogram, being based on a quickie JPEG conversion, are not at all accurate in detecting RAW saturation. Even with a histogram showing significant (say 1/2 stop) overexposure, there's still plenty of headroom to extract a well-balanced image from the RAW file. While ETTR is clearly the best way to maximize image quality, the techniques describe in the linked articles are a little simplistic. \$\endgroup\$ May 3, 2014 at 2:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ I've definitely found the same regarding headroom. I regularly overexpose by two stops without clipping. I avoid the blinkies and as he mentions, the histogram displayed when viewing a captured image is more accurate. I'm interested that you call his explanation 'simplistic'. Especially the second page. Do you have an alternate source that you find more accurate? (This is meant in a genuine, not a snarky way). \$\endgroup\$ May 6, 2014 at 12:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ Not taken as snarky :-) I don't have a source, just observations and experience. It seems that the histogram and blinkies are derived from the 1-megapixel preview jpeg that is displayed on the rear screen, which makes for some interesting questions. At that size each display pixel contains 22 image pixels, so it would be useful to know how those 22 pixels are combined (average? maximum? something else?) to derive data points for the histogram. \$\endgroup\$ May 6, 2014 at 18:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ @JimGarrison Thanks. So out of interest, what is your approach for achieving accurate ETTR? \$\endgroup\$ May 7, 2014 at 10:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ I don't really do anything special. Unless you're seriously underexposed the actual difference isn't going to be visible in a print and I just don't worry about it. It's all empirical and gut feel. \$\endgroup\$ May 7, 2014 at 20:18

2 Answers 2


The base ISO of all Canon cameras is ISO 100. This is the ISO with the lowest gain, without any in-camera magickry to achieve the setting (like ISO 50, which mucks with the actual exposure settings behind the scenes).

There is a lot of conjecture and misunderstanding about Canon's ISO settings because they use a "real/push/pull" model for ISO settings, rather than using native analog gain for all ISO settings. Canon only uses a standard analog gain (per-pixel amplification) for full stop ISO settings up to a certain high ISO level. So, ISO 100, 200, 400, ..., 3200 are usually achieved by using standard analog signal amplification. After a certain point, really high ISO settings in Canon cameras are achieved via a base analog amp., plus a secondary downstream (post-read/pre-ADC) amp, and possibly a digital boost.

For Canon cameras pre-5D III generation (i.e. 5D II, 7D, 50D, 550D, etc.) the highest directly amplified ISO settting is usually 1600, after which a combination of downstream amplification, push/pull, and possibly digital boost is used. For post-5D III generation (i.e. 5D III, 1D X, 6D, 70D, etc.) cameras, the highest directly amplified ISO setting is either 3200 or 6400, with the possibility that rebels still top out at ISO 1600.

Finally, third-stop ISO settings are achieved by using a 1/3rd stop "push" or "pull" using a downstream amplifier after read. ISO 125 is a third-stop "push" of ISO 100, where as ISO 160 is a third-stop "pull" of ISO 200. ISO 250 is a third-stop "push" of ISO 200, where as ISO 320 is a third-stop "pull" of ISO 400. This is why the 2/3rds stop ISO settings in Canon cameras are a little cleaner...the "pull" shoves the noise floor down a little bit.

The use of push/pull does not make ISO 160, 320, or 640 the "base" ISO...that is an internet myth, breed by conjecture, misunderstanding, and a simple lack of real knowledge of how Canon achieves the necessary signal boost for each ISO setting. All Canon cameras (with the exception of some of the earliest models) use ISO 100 as base ISO.

It should be noted that Base ISO is different than Unity ISO. Unity ISO is the ISO setting where gain is one, or in other words for every electron of charge, the ADC converts one DU (digital unit). It is pretty rare that Unity ISO is actually selectable, however there is usually a close third-stop setting to unity. What Unity ISO is depends on the camera, the sensor, the full-well capacity, and other factors (Roger Clark has lots of information on his site for popular Canon camera models, and within them he usually derives unity gain, if knowing it is important (some applications may benefit from unity gain).)

Regarding ETTR, and the use of Base ISO. That is a simple fallacy, really. ETTR simply means Expose to the Right. That's it. There should not be any additional caveats to that. ETTR is a very simple, strait forward rule, and it does not require that one always shoot at ISO 100 or base ISO. I am a Canon user, and rarely shoot at ISO 100 for most of my photography, which is birds and wildlife. Most of my photography is at least ISO 400, more often between 800 and 1600. I generally follow ETTR, regardless of the ISO setting.

ETTR offers a simple benefit: It puts more of the signal above the noise floor, which improves your editing latitude. ISO 100 is not, and should not be, a requirement for ETTR. Using ISO 100, assuming you have enough light, simply maximizes your dynamic range, within which ETTR is still shifting more of the signal above the noise floor. In Canon cameras, ISO 100, 200, and to some degree 400 have more read noise than all higher ISO settings. The higher read noise floor means you technically get more benefit from ETTR. If you are a landscape photographer, then ISO 100 is probably a given, but it is still not a requirement for ETTR.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The way Canon uses "push" when figuring exposure and then "pull" when converting from RAW for ISO settings of 160, 320, 640, 1250, etc. is a form of ETTR in and of itself. You are, for example, using a sensor set at ISO 400 sensitivity but figuring exposure based on ISO 320 which means you just exposed 1/3 stop to the right and then pulled it 1/3 stop the other way when converting from RAW. Just as ETTR always does, you give up a little headroom in the highlight areas in exchange for more signal (less noise) in the shadows. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    May 3, 2014 at 1:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ @jrista : Very nice answer. I have a small question : I took a shot of the milkyway at ISO 2000 with my Canon 6D. Understanding your point, it means I should have shot it at 2500 rather than 2000 ? (2/3rd are cleaner than 1/3rd) ? Did I got that part right ? And furthermore, I should always try and stick to 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, etc ? \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy M
    Jul 18, 2015 at 12:37
  • \$\begingroup\$ Actually, when it comes to astrophotography, on Canon cameras it is best to use full stop ISO settings. Because of the trickery Canon uses for the third-stop settings, you will not get properly linear results. If your doing milky way imaging, you should also be doing dark frame subtraction and flat field calibration. You need the most linear data you can get when doing that. \$\endgroup\$
    – jrista
    Jul 21, 2015 at 15:44

There's a lot of good background information in jrista's answer but at the end of the day, based on objective testing, the highest dynamic range in most Canon DSLR, including the 5DIII is at 160, 320, 640 ISO. A photographer should check his or her own specific camera against Bill Cleff's charts for objective measurement. The 5DIV, 5DS, 5DSR offer slightly different curves, but the 6D, 6DII, 7DII follow the 5DIII curve very closely.

For the 5DIII, the difference can be nearly a stop of dynamic range between ISO 160 and ISO 250 (half a stop of dynamic range is recovered by stepping up to ISO 320).

After ISO 640, the stepping becomes less important (800 ISO dynamic range is almost as high as 640, the rest if pretty linear with a preference for 1600, 2500, 3200 & 5000 based on real world testing.

As a photographer and a videographer, I'd like to know what will improve my photography. Remembering to prefer 160, 320, 640, 800, 1600, 2500 for stills and video is not hard to do. On a 5DIII, going above 3200 ISO is a shortcut to very poor image quality. The fall off is so steep that there's really no point to continuing to shoot above 3200 ISO unless its new reportage or you are seeking a blotchy look with a lot of chroma noise.

With Canon sensors, shadows are noisy so there is no point in shooting heavily underexposed (more than a stop) and hoping to raise the exposure in post (shadow recovery works a treat with most recent Sony, Fuji and Nikon bodies), so basically after ISO 3200, we're done. Fortunately there's a lot of affordable fast glass for Canon so it's not difficult to keep up in visible low light. No seeing in the dark A7S or A7III exploits to be had though.

Going further, with Canon bodies, one is best to ETTR (expose to the right) to maximise colour depth and minimise shadow noise. With Sony, Fuji and Nikon bodies, it's better to underexpose a bit (ETTL) and lift in post. I've been shocked at how much further I can push underexposed photos on Fuji bodies (X-M1 and X-H1) than with my Canon 5DIII. Basically Canon's hardware requires photographers to behave themselves and try to shoot accurate exposures. The OOB tasty Canon colours and shallow depth of field at full frame (Sony and Nikon colours are harder work to process attractively, Fuji only offers APS-C) keep the 5DIII and its siblings a very competitive photo tool as long as you don't fall into the ISO invariance and ETTL fashion trap which simply doesn't suit Canon sensors at all.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.