My question is about the center column height on tripods. If it is so unstable, as it is described in many websites/forums, then why do manufacturers add it to tripods?

My question may sound naive, but I like learning this kind of details.

5 Answers 5


There are a number of good reasons for a center column. The first, and most obvious is that even if you've chosen a tripod that's sized for comfortable eye-level use without the center column extended, every once in a while you'll want some additional height, and on those occasions, the extra height may be worth the penalty you'll pay in stability. In this case, the guidance you've read should indicate that you should avoid using the center column when you don't have to do so.

In addition to height, many tripod manufacturers design their center columns to serve other functions, too. It's very common, for instance, to include a hook of some sort at the bottom of the column - this can be used to hang weight (ex: your camera bag) that can help stabilize the tripod in windy conditions.

Some center columns can be inverted so your camera can be positioned very close to the ground (note the hook at the top): enter image description here

Finally, some center columns can switch to a horizontal orientation, which allows additional positioning flexibility -- especially helpful for macros and landscapes: enter image description here

  • 11
    In addition to gaining a little extra height, the center column lets you adjust the height with a single control. You could get the tripod close to the right height with the center column half extended, then have roughly 6 inches of adjustment either direction. Readjusting height with the legs is far more clumsy. Apr 1, 2014 at 12:10

Others have addressed your question well, but I wanted to address one other thing:

If it is so unstable, as it is described in many websites/forums, then why do manufacturers add it to tripods?

Stability is relative. A tripod with its legs and center column fully extended is still steadier than you, handholding the camera.

Think about it in terms of "stops." A tripod can buy you many stops of adjustment on the camera. A tripod and a remote shutter release let you shoot fireworks with many-second exposures, for example, which would be impossible hand-held. What can you gain by dropping the center column?

Consider this picture:

jiggly vuurwurken

See the jiggly streaks in the fireworks? That's because I shot it with a tripod but without a remote shutter release. You're seeing my hand jitters in the streaks, vibrating the tripod through the camera body. Dropping the center column wouldn't have helped.

This is not about my poor planning, which caused me to leave the shutter release in the other camera bag. The same observation could apply to wind or ground rumble from shooting next to a busy highway.

Should you drop the center column if you don't need the extra height adjustment? Absolutely. Should you refuse to buy a tripod simply because it has a center column? No. I won't buy one without a center column. (Or a QR system, for that matter.)

  • 1
    So you say that the center column offers something than nothing. I can use it when there is no other option. Is this right?
    – Morpho
    Apr 1, 2014 at 12:34
  • 4
    I'm saying it's a tool like any other. Use it when you need to, don't use it if you don't need it. It is not good, bad, evil, or wonderful. It's just a tool. Apr 1, 2014 at 12:45

Tripods are not always used to stabilize the camera, although that would be their main purpose.

Sometimes they are just used to have a fixed perspective over time. e.g. for filming, time lapse, panoramas to be stitched or just studio or table top arrangements or photo booth, selfies etc. pp.

In these situations exposure time is not the issue at all. Even if a center column of a simple tripod may de-stabilize the system a bit, the extra height is often welcome.


I think there are a few extra possibilities in addition to the pretty comprehensive answer you have:

  • Marketing - a 6' tripod sounds better than a 5' even if the difference isn't something you'd want to use. This may be more of an issue on low-end kit.

  • Tripods aren't just used with cameras -- when used for example with telescopes the centre column provides a quick way of switching between users of different heights while not moving the field of view too much. With a scope it's quite important to get the height right as you might be looking into it for some time.

  • Size & weight: if I wanted the same max height on my tripod without a centre column it would need to have 4-section legs or be ridiculously long. That means around 3x as much tube for the final section, plus the locking mechanisms. This is slightly offset in my case by manfrotto using an aluminium centre column on an otherwise carbon tripod, and I do use a head chosen mainly for weight when hiking with it. An issue if you're carrying it quite a few miles over rough terrain with all your other gear - not an issue in a studio or even driving to landscape spots.

Note that it would be easy enough to implement a bag-hanging hook without a centre column - in fact mine has a bag hook on the tripod boss, not the column


Its a bit like asking why the shower has a setting which scalds you. You have to make your own decisions, and know if you have the centre column fully extended that you are taking a risk. Weight up the benefits against the risks.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.