I've timed my 5D Mk II at 2.1 FPS during burst shooting, which is way lower than 3.9 FPS promised by Canon.
This time does not depend on image quality / size so I assume memory card is not a limiting factor. I have AF disabled. Tried both with and without live view. Noise reduction is disabled.
What am I missing?

P. S. My speed measurement is very accurate - performed by recording and analyzing shutter sound.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Was your shutter speed fast enough for 3.9 fps? \$\endgroup\$
    – Vertigo
    Feb 18, 2014 at 14:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ Do you have Noise Reduction turned on? this WILL lower your frame rate. \$\endgroup\$ Feb 18, 2014 at 14:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ Can you enable 'shoot without card' in the camera menus and test it again. Is the card itself a high-speed card? \$\endgroup\$ Feb 18, 2014 at 15:51

2 Answers 2


The maximum frame rates are just that - maximum frame rates. There are several things that will reduce the maximum frame rate.

  • High ISO The higher the ISO you have selected, the slower the frame rate will be.
  • Noise Reduction the stronger the in-camera noise reduction selected, the slower the frame rate will be.
  • AI Servo Mode If you are using AI Servo AF mode the camera will refocus between each frame.
  • In low light Most Canon User Manuals say "The continuous shooting speed might also decrease indoors and under low light"
  • Various other options Other options that increase the amount of in-camera processing per shot can cause the frame rate to slow. Peripheral Illumination Correction, Auto Lighting Optimizer, Highlight Tone Priority, etc.
  • Low Battery Charge When the charge state of the camera's battery is low it can reduce the frame rate.
  • Increased Detail Increased amounts of fine detail in the scene, such as a field with grass.
  • Slow Shutter Speed Selecting a very slow shutter speed will reduce the maximum frame rate. For example, if the shutter is staying open for 3/4 second per exposure, you won't get faster than about one frame per second.
  • Defective Memory Card Although this usually manifests itself by reducing the number of shots before your buffer fills and increases the time it takes the buffer to clear and the frame rate while the buffer is full, it can also affect initial frame rate.

Since your question eliminates many of these issues, unless you are using a very high ISO or a shutter speed slower than about 1/250 second it sounds like there may be something mechanically wrong with your camera.

  • \$\begingroup\$ I have indeed had slow shutter speed, and of course I didn't even think of looking at it. I'm still not at 3.9, but at least over 3.1 now. ISO 200, I assume that's low enough. Thanks for the great checklist. \$\endgroup\$ Feb 18, 2014 at 14:24
  • \$\begingroup\$ To find your camera's maximum frame rate you need to shoot at base ISO. Turn off not only AF and NR, but also PIC, ALO, HTP, etc. Shoot a well lit scene with low complexity at a fairly wide aperture. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Feb 18, 2014 at 14:32
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Thanks. The problem is I didn't care much what FPS I get, but I expected the camera to shoot at this constant FPS at least in a wide range of settings, so the valuable conclusion is I can forget about that. \$\endgroup\$ Feb 18, 2014 at 14:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks; this made me understand why I did not even get a 3-picture burst (for AEB) out of my 450D. The single harmful factor was noise reduction for high ISO that slowed down even at ISO 100. \$\endgroup\$
    – Raphael
    Jul 9, 2014 at 7:51
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Raphael It depends. The initial burst rate should not be affected much by more detail in the shot, but the files would still take slightly longer to write to the card, as even RAW .cr2 files use lossless compression. This would affect the longer term burst rate once the buffer is full and the next shot has to wait until enough space for it is cleared from the buffer. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Jul 9, 2014 at 11:24

I would think the image quality setting would affect how many shots processed in a second. I think the lowest quality jpg would process faster for each shot in succession. I'm just learning, so I may be wrong about that. I bought my 5D Mark II used, because it is what I can afford to get my first full frame camera. I have gotten nice results with it.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.