I am looking for a new digital camera that doesn't break the bank. I am certainly not a professional but I like my photos to look professional.

  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ What do you mean by break the bank? Some people consider 500 dollars cheap, others consider it too much. Also, do you want an SLR or a point and shoot? SLRs generally take better looking photos, but are much more of an investment in money and dedication. \$\endgroup\$
    – rm999
    Nov 9, 2010 at 20:57
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ Hi User2121, and welcome to Photo.SE. It would be very helpful if you could be much more specific about your need and your situation. As rm999 stated, what each individual considers "cheap" is extremely subjective. \$\endgroup\$
    – jrista
    Nov 9, 2010 at 20:58
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Ditto "look professional". What does that mean to you, exactly? \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Nov 10, 2010 at 0:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ Do you want to learn about photography or just get a camera which will take good photos of things you point it at? Some cameras give you more control and more chance to learn, others don't really give you any control but can generally take nice photos... \$\endgroup\$ Nov 10, 2010 at 1:48
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ And also one should remember that not camera takes pictures, but a photographer. My point is, first learn how to take pictures with any camera you can afford and then you will realize what you miss, and what you need. You can fill your drawer (or wherever you want to keep your gear) with $20000 or more worth stuff but it will not take you a step closer to professional look photos until you can see and learn how and what to do.... \$\endgroup\$
    – user1681
    Nov 10, 2010 at 11:11

3 Answers 3


You need to be specific at what you want to do with it. Just like I can't recommend you which car to buy without knowing anything about you, the same goes for cameras. We don't even know what 'break the bank' means for you, it is very relative.

Definitely if you are looking for high quality, people will tell you to get a DSLR or interchangeable lens camera. The latter is smaller but also slower, if you don't shoot things that move, you won't care about that.

My advice is to read a buying guide that explains to you what the important points to consider are.

Don't get fooled into thinking that you need a professional camera to make fantastic images. Take a look at this pro who takes a $150 digital camera when he goes on vacations.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ great link about the P&S guy :) \$\endgroup\$
    – BBischof
    Nov 9, 2010 at 21:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ The buying guide you linked is excellent. I am impressed by how well researched and presented it is. \$\endgroup\$
    – labnut
    Nov 10, 2010 at 5:05

Sometimes gear is not to be blamed for the photographs to come out "unprofessional".. Before transitioning to an SLR three years ago, I had a really modest kodak camera and used to look at flickr's "interesting" pictures from that camera to get the needed result (by looking at the exif to check the modes they were using and the composition).

Since you probably don't want to get neck deep into photography, nor want to lug a heavy camera around, I'd say grab a great well reviewed P&S camera like the G11 and use flickr to learn taking great pictures with it (http://www.flickr.com/cameras/canon/powershot_g11/)


The question is quite vague, what does professional mean to you? What's your budget? Breaking the bank varies by person. The Pentax 645D at $10,000 breaks the bank for me, but the Canon 5D mark II at $2500 does not, but for someone else, $2500 is way off the line.

In any case, the best way to approach the purchase is based on your needs and desires. To that end, DP Review has a nice tool for plugging in what you're interested in and then recommending some options as a result. That's a place to start, but then you need to look at the potential options online, especially images. At which point, the Flickr Camera Finder becomes handy for seeing the art of the possible.

However, despite all of that, the camera is just a tool. Your pictures will look as professional as you make them, end of story. For some people, you could put the lowest specified camera into their hands and they will produce incredible photos that would make some of us drool. For other people, you could put a $42,000 Phase One camera in front of them and they'll produce a piece of junk. It's not the gear, it's the photographer. If you still don't believe that, consider this: some of the greatest photographs in the last 100 years were taken by photographers using gear that we would currently consider to be utterly archaic.

Net effect, you need to figure out exactly what you want and then use that information to make a decision. Then, if you want professional looking results, you need to practice, practice, and then practice some more. Unless you do both, the camera you buy will not answer your question, regardless of what you choose.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.