1

I have a large number of photos that have been taken, which are blurred, some out of focus and some from camera shake.

I need to sharpen these photos but photoshops (cs5) tools just aren't good enough. I have looked for similar questions on here and see cs6 has a feature called deblur and something called focus it for GIMP.

Are there any good quality programs (free or paid) or photoshop plugins designed to recover blurred images to a good(or useable standard)? so far I have found:

peta pixel

focus magic

but i am not convienced of the quality of these tools.

also does having the raw files make more likely to recover the images?

8

As tenmiles stated, post-process defocus correction is not a solution for lack of good focus. Getting good focus in camera is a critical aspect of good photography. That said, there are some solutions, and we all make mistakes sometimes, and it's reasonable to expect an option to recover when you make such a mistake.

While Photoshop CS6 has a basic deblur feature built in, there are some tools on the market that can help. One of the better ones is Topaz InFocus. Like other similar tools, this is by no means a real solution to badly defocused images. For moderately to highly defocused images, or if you have a thin DOF and your focal plane landed on the wrong point, there is nothing that will really solve your problem...not to a level of quality that would be acceptable for art, anyway (however these tools do offer a utilitarian deconvolution capability for non-artistic purposes with almost any level of defocus.)

Topaz InFocus, the deblur tool I've used most, is actually excellent with very small amounts of defocus, and quite good at fixing small to moderate defocus. If can produce entirely acceptable artistic results if you aren't trying to correct wildly incorrect defocus problems. If you push it too hard, you will start to notice various kinds of artifacts that, while the content that was blurred will start to show up, it really won't be of any quality that you could keep.

Topaz InFocus can also combat blur from shake or motion as well. It'll detect the direction of blurring and try to deconvolve it. Again, for smaller blur orders, you can correct these problems quite well. For higher order blur, your success will come with artifacts that may or may not be acceptable for artistic reasons. For utilitarian uses, you can deblur quite considerably and recover detail, such as heavily blurred text, to readable proportions.

  • Thankyou. Hopefully this can go some way to recovering a potentially bad situation – tony09uk Jan 27 '14 at 20:49
6

Sharpening is not a fix for lack of focus. If you fail to nail the focus there is little you can do about it. If you happen to be using a Lytro, then you can adjust the point of focus, but that's because this device was specifically designed for that.

The only other thing you can do is reduce the viewing size or increase the viewing distance. Everything looks like it's in focus on the LCD of a camera because it's so small so reducing its size, or apparent size (by increasing distance), will help with focus.

Having the raw files won't help, only nailing the focus in camera will really help.

  • Damn, I was hoping raw files would have data independent of the lens focus, but i guess raw format is not designed to perform miracles. – Sridhar Sarnobat Jul 8 '18 at 2:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.