Is any of the other major photosharing sites better than Flickr for the albums hierarchy? I mean the possibility to define a depth of more than two... If I'm not mistaken in flickr you can only define Collections and then Albums in those Collections, but you can't get any deeper.
3
-
Out of curiosity what is your organizational use case? – Shizam Nov 7 '10 at 18:18
-
I like to have my images separated by year, for example. – Carles Nov 7 '10 at 20:58
-
1You can also tag your images by year, giving a way to look at them across that axis. – mattdm Jan 29 '11 at 17:13
Add a comment
|
Flickr does allow a collection to contain either sets, or other collections, giving you that hierarchy
-
Nice, I didn't notice this. I had some sets in a collection and it didn't let me add another collection inside... Thanks. – Carles Nov 7 '10 at 20:59
-
@Carles I found it "less than obvious" that a collection could only contain one type of thing, but I do do this myself with a few collections – Rowland Shaw Nov 8 '10 at 8:45
-
@Rowland - now, if flickr would make collections shareable, that would make them significantly more useful. – b w Aug 31 '11 at 19:48
-
@bill what do you mean by "shareable"? You can always send the link out – Rowland Shaw Aug 31 '11 at 20:00
-
@Rowland, i mean to be able to send a guest pass to someone for a collection. flickr.com/groups/flickrideas/discuss/72157600044271250 – b w Aug 31 '11 at 20:42
SmugMug allows for what is essentially three levels:
Categories
--Subcategories
----Galleries
You can completely customize the names of Categories, Subcategories, and Galleries.