Is a soft-focus image just minimally out of focus?

2 Answers 2


No. A soft focus image is in focus, but exhibits a high degree of spherical aberration. Edges in the image will be relatively sharp, but will be surrounded by a kind of diffuse softness. This is often particularly visible as an ethereal glow around highlights. That's very different from the indiscriminate blur of missed focus.

This is a common property of many older portrait lenses, and some are even designed specifically to have the effect in variable amounts. See How do soft focus or defocus control rings work? for some great answers explaining this in technical detail.

You may also find How can I approximate 'soft focus' digitally? to be interesting, if only because you can see that the approach taken isn't the same as one might use to approximate out-of-focus blur.


No, it is a combination of light that is in focus and light that is out of focus (or otherwise blurred). An image that is just out of focus doesn't get that dreamy look, it just lacks detail.

I had a Canon 1000 camera that had a soft-focus function. It would take a double exposure, one in focus and then one out of focus.

A soft focus filter (both optical and digital ones) works in pretty much the same way, just that it uses the same image for both exposures, not two images taken after each other.

We let T-Max the cat demonstrate:

Sharp + Blurred = Soft focus

(The middle image is blurred using Gaussian blur with a radius of 2.0, then one image is just overlayed on the other with an opacity of 50%. Different settings can be used depending on taste and what the original image looks like.)

  • While doing a simple Gaussian blur and overlaying (note usually using a blend mode other than normal) approximates the soft focus effect, it isn't really the same as what one gets optically. To really recreate it digitally, you'd need a light-field capture. Alternately, a slightly more sophisticated digital approach might treat highlights specially. See How can I approximate 'soft focus' digitally? for more.
    – mattdm
    Jan 13, 2014 at 13:53
  • @mattdm: An optical soft focus filter would blur some of the light and let some of the light through unaltered, so the example above would be an exact replication of that. You can of course mix more layers with different effects to get a more advanced effect, but I wanted to show the basic principle.
    – Guffa
    Jan 13, 2014 at 14:16
  • Right, it is also the case that a blur filter would not be the same as true soft focus.
    – mattdm
    Jan 13, 2014 at 14:42
  • @mattdm: That depends on what you say is "true" soft focus; a built in lens flaw, or vaseline on the front lens...
    – Guffa
    Jan 13, 2014 at 15:04
  • Right, vaseline on the lens isn't really it. The soft focus effect disks with multiple holes of differing sizes are closer.
    – mattdm
    Jan 13, 2014 at 15:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.