I try to shoot some pictures of apparel, lingerie, cometics on a white fluffy rag or a white paper board with a Canon EOS Rebel T2i + a Canon - Speedlite 270EX II External Flash on a tripod in day light in a mostly white room. I want not shadow-less pictures but with little shadows, natural colors similar to enter image description here from http://www.photigy.com/how-to-photograph-textured-subject-like-shoes/ or enter image description here

Time to laugh: I spent 3 days taking hundreds of pictures, my back and legs hurt of continuous folding/unfolding. My photos - worthless piece of crap, the camera - crap.

First, with the flash. If it's pointed directly at the object, there no shadows at all, all of them are eliminated, ugly crap. If it is cosmetic bottles, they have disgusting illuminated spots. If the flash is pointed at a ceiling, it is still crap, it doesn't help much. Colors are not natural but very grey, the focus is blurry. Cheap work.

Second, without the flash. Holly molly, absolute crap. I would draw by hand better than taking pictures like that. Colors - dull, no focus at all like in a cheap camera for $100. Only Photoshop helps, and I can resurrect photos.

I tried to make a diffuser of white paper for the flash - didn't help, a 5% improvement.

I tried to shoot under a fluorescent bulb - crap. I bought another $40 bulb of the 3M brand with 1000 lums - it didn't help, yellowish pictures, dull, grey, poor focus.

The camera's settings are auto, I tried manual, set all properties 100 times - the same result like in auto. The manual focus doesn't help, works the same like in auto focus.

Please help.

My masterpieces (not edited): enter image description here enter image description here

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The camera definitely is not "crap". But only a single flash and especially daylight are less than ideal conditions for this kind of photos. Even in the link you posted it says "Start with 1-3 spot lights". \$\endgroup\$
    – his
    Dec 29, 2013 at 15:56

3 Answers 3


This is a big subject, so any answer is going to be incomplete. Entire books have been written on lighting and product photography; if you're interested in a good one, "Light: Science and Magic" is in its third printing, with 234 out of its 277 combined reviews being 5-star on Amazon-dot-com. It's a text on principles, not a photographer's look-at-what-I-did portfolio, and covers a lot of ground. Well worth it if that style of learning appeals to you.

To create useful shadows the flash needs to be away from the camera. An off-camera TTL cable will let you do this; Canon has the OC-E3 cable, but much cheaper alternatives are not hard to find. This will let you move the flash four or five feet (1-1.5m) away from the camera, which will make a huge difference for tabletop photography. You can preview the effects of the flash placement by moving a flashlight beam across your subject, and the difference can be tremendous.

The 270EX and T2i has two exposure controls that you'll need to juggle, and you'll need to be out of Auto mode to do it.

The first is exposure compensation, marked by a +/- icon. A positive value makes the image brighter, and a negative one makes it darker. Use this when a white background or a dark subject dominates the frame, but keep an eye on the highlights and deep shadows when you use it. For example, there's some delicate highlights on the bottle of lube (excuse me, 'Enchanted Nights Ultra Lubricating Hand and Body Cream') that would become ugly if they were much brighter. If you're in Manual mode you set this more directly, by choosing a combination of shutter speed and aperture that's brighter or darker than the central meter position that the camera will encourage you to use.

The second control is flash exposure compensation. This tells the camera how much light the flash should add to the scene relative to the metered non-flash exposure – it makes the flash brighter or darker. A less powerful flash blast can fill in shadows when window/ambient is the main light source, and more power can make the flash be your key light and let ambient light be the fill. This is where you can really change how the photo looks.

Make sure that you have the camera on a tripod while you're doing all of this, and have the flash on a second tripod or on a stand as well. Having a consistent placement makes it much easier to see the effect of small changes and repeat what works. Also, don't do three days' worth of effort before looking at the results. :) I may take dozens of photos before I've dialled in my setup, look at them on the computer to confirm, and then wipe the card before taking the few 'good' photos that I did all of the work for – then repeat it all again for my next setup.

Finally, remember that what you're doing at the camera stage is simply creating the best possible raw material for digital editing. Removing the background, fine-tuning the lighting, and boosting the contrast and saturation is the next step in taking your lube bottle from its present 'American Apparel' advertisement state to a fully-groomed Victoria's Secret runway backdrop. After all, nothing in real life actually looks like it does in the magazines.

  1. For shadows you will have to keep your flash at certain angle. head on flash will not result in flattering results.

  2. If you would like to try without flash, make sure you have enough light in room via Window or artificial light.

  3. You may not get 'bingo' image with straight out of camera, but you will surely get with descent shot + Light room (or Photoshop)

  4. Looking at your underexposed picture, I have a feeling your meeting is not spot-on! Try with different metering (Spot / Center-weight / Matrix). To start with Matrix may help.


The reasons your having difficulty getting great color are different for each of these images.

1.) Exposure must be correct: No blown out highlights as in photo #1. So keep your highlights with detail under 242.
If your camera is profiled using the ColorChecker Passport system (recommended) then make sure your shooting that target and profiling your camera at a good usable range. (246-15) Both the first and second images have highlights that are too clean. Overexposure will wash out your colors.(RGB values)

Underexposure is also a killer as in the third and fourth images. The whites are no longer white and that gray's out the product colors. Remember: Light is color. The absence of light is...well dark and nobody sees color in the dark very well. So keep the lighting level in the proper range for the subject.

Exposure seems to be your main problem, so try that first and move to the other suggestions below.

2.) Shoot on manual. Because it's not possible for your camera and flash combo to give you the creativity that a photographer can provide. So if your not on manual, that's the best place to live.

3,) Use a light meter. Not the one that came with your camera. When doing flash photography, you need a incident light meter to balance flash and ambient light in a very accurate way. Your camera's light meter is a reflection meter and can only give you the combined exposure.

You can cheat and do a meter reading in camera without flash and dial in the flash until you have the look your going for. (this assumes your shooting manual).

You can do a good job with a single light source, but for product photography you may want to use fill cards or mirrors to get light where you need it for shape and detail. It can be done and done well, but it takes a bit to master, so take your time setting up.

  • \$\begingroup\$ I'm not sure I understand what you're referring to with the numbers (242 and 246-15). Could you elaborate on that or link to an explanation? \$\endgroup\$ Dec 29, 2013 at 18:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ @BartArondson RGB values. Live by the numbers. 0 is completely black and 255 is completely white. Details are important so the value you set your lightest tone at is critical to making sure your representing the product. Check out the zone system for what worked in the past. Same principal applies though. \$\endgroup\$ Dec 29, 2013 at 21:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ Now it's clear. Maybe mention that the numbers are referring to RGB in your answer to make it more clear. \$\endgroup\$ Dec 29, 2013 at 22:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.