1

This question already has an answer here:

I have a Canon Eos 650D. I want to buy a macro lens, both for macro and portrait.

Everybody tells me the Canon 100mm is better then Tamron. But Tamron has VC. Which lens is better? Which one do you prefer?

|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Michael C, Paul Cezanne, MikeW♦, Matt Grum, John Cavan Sep 5 '13 at 22:53

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • I have mixed feelings here. I think in general asking for expert opinion on specific lenses works pretty well on the site. In some cases it starts getting crazy (e.g. when there's a long list of random zoom lenses and we're asked to pick a combination of them). There's kind of a fine balance between too open-ended and overly-predecided. That said, the other question does ask about Tamron macro lenses in this focal range... it just didn't get answers that match, and the top answer is really narrow, so that's not so great as a duplicate target. – mattdm Sep 6 '13 at 2:14
  • 1
    And all that said, it looks like the key question here might actually be How useful is image stabilization in a macro lens? – mattdm Sep 6 '13 at 2:16
  • I missed some mentions of Tamron in the linked to question, as it is very Canon brand centric. It is probably fine to leave that as the duplicate. I do agree that the real helpful answer here is IS vs non IS in a macro though. – dpollitt Sep 6 '13 at 2:55
1

You can use online tools to compare both of these lenses as well as the very comparable Canon 100mm f/2.8 IS L USM lens.

Here is a comparison of the following three lenses at DxOMark:

  • Tamron SP 90mm F/2.8 Di MACRO 1:1 VC USD Canon
  • Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
  • Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

As you can see based on that spec comparison, they are all very similar but the Canon 100mm L macro stands out from the crowd.

This is probably my favorite comparison of the two lenses that you mentioned, the VC Tamron and the Non-IS Canon at the-digital-picture.com. It is very obvious how much higher quality the Canon is at f/2.8. So yes you can use the Tamron with stabilization, but if the image even on a tripod is not as sharp, is that worth it to you? I would choose the sharpest lens then consider stabilization as a secondary thought, but that is just an opinion.

They will all should be generally sharp and excellent for both portraits at that focal length and macro work. Image stabilization is available in the more expensive versions of the lenses from both manufacturers, and I encourage you to read the following for advice on that topic:

How useful is image stabilization in a macro lens?

Overall, the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro Lens is one of the sharpest and most economical choices found in the entire Canon lineup. If you absolutely need IS/VC then I would compare the Canon IS to the Tamron VC instead for a more fair comparison. If you don't absolutely need IS/VC for your uses, the Canon non IS is always an excellent choice.

|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.