What is the best way to capture the moon with a city background? The moon is so bright that if I do long exposure to capture the city, the moon will be completely blown out into a white star. Is HDR the only way?


This is the same as any photo where one part is way brighter than the other:

  1. Graduated ND filter (only relevant if all the buildings are below the moon and you don't care about the exposure of the sky)

  2. Take two photos and combine them manually (pretty easy in your case because you just have to copy-paste the moon between photos)

  3. HDR

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    +1 - Option 2 is how I would go with it. I suspect that the OP may be looking to take a night shot of the Toronto harbour with the tall ships in. – John Cavan Jun 21 '13 at 23:17
  • That's scary...I didn't know my location is exposed... – erotsppa Jun 21 '13 at 23:21
  • Where are you seeing that? – erotsppa Jun 21 '13 at 23:49
  • Your location isn't exposed, it was from a question you posted that mentioned a restaurant. – John Cavan Jun 22 '13 at 0:52
  • Specifically this one: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/39652/… – John Cavan Jun 22 '13 at 1:23

You might want to consider a Graduated ND filter. A graduated ND filter darkens the top half of the frame, allowing you to use a longer exposure than would otherwise be possible.

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    In the case of the moon vs. city skyline, you probably need somewhere in the neighborhood of 9-10 stops difference. An ND 10 is five stops, so you would need to stack two ND 10 graduated filters, if you can even find such. – Michael C Jun 21 '13 at 21:38
  • What's wrong with stacking two grad NDs? – Chinmay Kanchi Jun 21 '13 at 22:28
  • Color cast and lining up the grads. Also, the moon is going to be more of a point light source. – John Cavan Jun 21 '13 at 23:16
  • The darkest GND filters I am aware of are 3-stop Singh-Ray GND filters. It would take stacking three to reduce by nine stops. Stacking GND filters can be problematic for the reasons this question discusses: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/35601/… – Michael C Jun 23 '13 at 9:12

Personally, since the shot is probably going to be long exposure and doesn't move. I'd do two exposures and blend them together in post. It'll be the easiest and cheapest approach.

HDR could work, but getting the spread correct would be difficult and is overkill for your needs.

Graduated ND filters are great in situations where the bright part is going to cause bleed in to the darker portion of the image or you need to take a quick shot because there is motion you need to stop, but they are a reasonably expensive specialty item.

If you simply setup a tripod, take one photo of the moon and one photo of the skyline properly exposed, then you can overlap them in Photoshop and simply mask one on to the other. The night sky should allow for a pretty smooth gradient to be applied to blend the background or you can do it directly along the skyline if you prefer. You could also try an additive blend after removing the overexposed moon from the skyline shot.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.