I have one lens hood for a 28-105mm lens that is petal shaped. I have another lens hood for a 50mm lens that is fully round. If the purpose of the lens hood is to block stray light, then wouldn't fully round always block more?
As Chills stated, petal shaped hoods are designed to better take into account the wider shape of a camera's film or sensor.
This article on Lens Flare has a good description of lens hoods and how they function.
18This doesn't really answer the question, just link to a article / page that might. Would be better if the answer contained the information, like @Reid's answer. Jul 13, 2012 at 11:37
Here's an image that may help people to visualise why many lens hoods are petal-shaped.
This is a great image. Did you create it or find it somewhere?– mattdmFeb 24, 2017 at 16:08
6Thanks. I created it. I'd started learning 3ds Max at the time, so was looking for things to practise on, and thought it would help people to visualise why the petals make sense. I must have used Reid's answer as a script to follow to create my image. Feb 24, 2017 at 16:19
The petal design is more effective. Think of what you can see through your lens: it is a pyramid-shaped chunk of space that falls within your view, one that has a rectangular rather than a square base. Now imagine placing a round lens hood atop that pyramid - there will be a large gap on each side, because the corners bump into the round opening first. A petal-shaped hood fills in these gaps, excluding more stray light.
For wider angle lenses the optimal design is the petal shape. This is because of the rectangular sensor and wide field of view.
5The optimal design for all lenses is petal shaped, but I suppose for longer lenses it would be quite a petal.– ReidJul 16, 2010 at 2:20
2@Reid Preidhorsky As you say, because of the narrower FoV for telephoto lenses, the hood would have to be seriously long before it became necessary to petal-shape it in order to avoid vignetting.– EddJul 22, 2010 at 15:55
1For some fisheyes expected to produce a circular image, I would assume that a round shape is optimal. But in most cases we are using a circular lens to take rectangular pictures on a rectangular sensor or film. Apr 27, 2013 at 12:46
Every lens projects a circular image, but film and digital sensors are rectangular. In the case of DSLRs, the rectangle is usually quite oblong, with the standard 3:2 aspect ratio — that is, half again as much width as height.
The more a lens hood shades except the part that forms the image, the better. Petal hoods can take advantage of this by providing more shading for the parts of the frame that are farthest from the edge of the circle (primarily the top and bottom, followed by the edges) and less shading where the frame gets close (the corners).
Focal length is also a big factor, again for logical reasons — the wider the lens, the wider the hood has to be to stay out of the way. This means that for longer focal lengths ("telephoto lenses"), a tubular non-petal design can provide quite a lot of shade, and going to a petal design is basically unnecessary and could be even unwieldy, protruding way, way out.
As a practical example, the following image was taken with a 23mm lens, which has a nice petal hood, but which I had quickly attached so that it was diagonally-askew rather than on straight. You can see exactly what it'd be like if the hood extended to the length of the petal all the way around:
Petal shaped hoods are better (because they fit better the rectangular size of the negative/sensor), but they can only be used in cameras which have a non-rotating front element.
Short answer: Yes, a round tubular lens hood will always block more stray light than a petal-shaped lens hood.
BUT, that's only half of the answer, however. The part that is missing is, "without cutting off (vignetting) the corners of the image at the widest angle used, in the case of a zoom." (an important omission, no?)
The petal shape is one compromise solution unless designed specifically for a particular fixed-focal lens.
Another solution is used by some manufacturers who make an over-size tube lens filter and then cut a rectangular window in the end for the light blocking.
Motion picture cameras have such a thing attached to the camera mount in some way. It is also called a matte box and allows various inserts to mask the shot from various things and for various effects. It is a pleated accordion-fold affair that allows it to be changed for various set-ups.
Not really. A round tubular hood can only be as long as the shortest part of a petal shaped hood before it begins to cause vignetting in the corners of the frame, assuming the petal shaped hood is designed to be just out of the frame along all four edges of the frame. In the case of very long focal length lenses, it doesn't matter because the angle of view is so narrow that a hood would need to be several feet long to cause vignetting. Jul 15, 2020 at 22:06