5

India has an annual "festival of colors" where participants throw colored powder on each other. The idea is apparently spreading.

A LensRentals blogpost titled "How to Ruin Your (or Our) Gear in 5 Minutes" says that the color gets everywhere:

The color dust is very fine, tiny specs, made to stick on people as they run by. Because of this, the lenses’ weather sealing, front filters, etc. don’t even slow this stuff down. It’s throughout the entire lens stuck on every element, on the gears and helicoids, and in the mirror box of the camera too. And yes, that includes pro-level lenses on pro-level cameras, all of which are supposedly weather sealed.

If I want to take pictures of something like this, how can I protect the camera?

Would it be sufficient to wrap the camera in a plastic bag? Or would you need the kind of waterproof housing made for underwater photography?

Is anyone willing to share their experience?

|improve this question
  • 3
    See this earlier question on dealing with a non-protected camera after Holi: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/21038 – mattdm May 9 '13 at 16:20
  • 1
    Is it an option to cheap camera and lenses, possibly one already near the end of its lifetime, that you don't mind destroying? – b_jonas Jun 8 '13 at 9:29
  • @ZsbánAmbrus I suppose I could resurrect an old compact camera. I think the "glorified plastic bag" sounds like the best option for when I want to bring my DSLR. – j-g-faustus Jun 8 '13 at 18:33
  • 1
    See: this CiC post about someone successfully sealing off and protecting their gear while shooting a color run. – inkista Feb 23 '17 at 23:25
  • I'd be curious to know how long it was after he shot that when mysterious problems with his lens and camera started showing up. The main dial on the grip is likely toast after just a few dozen rotations just from looking at the post event photo of the camera. – Michael C Feb 24 '17 at 3:38
6

They key would be to get something air tight as opposed to weather proof. An underwater enclosure would work but might be a bit expensive. One of the lower depth water proofing solutions (basically a glorified plastic bag with reinforced seal) would probably do the trick though. Just be sure to wash and dry it thoroughly prior to breaking the seal after you are done. You can find pretty decent solutions for up to 15ft depth for around $100 to $150.

I don't have any direct experience to know for sure what does and doesn't work. But I don't see how a waterproofing system would fail and I don't think I'd personally want to risk trying to use simple plastic wrapping as you need to clean the powder away before opening it which likely means submersion.

|improve this answer
  • 3
    Sir, your language. That's a " a glorified plastic bag with reinforced seal and a cheap 'protection' filter", if you don't mind... – user2719 May 9 '13 at 17:46
  • Thanks, makes sense. So something like this, I guess: dicapacusa.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=WPS10 – j-g-faustus May 9 '13 at 18:05
  • 1
    The dust from colour is really, really fine. If you don't want to use a waterproof enclosure, or perhaps even with one, you might be well-served by using a long telephoto lens to take your shots from a good distance away. Your composition and the intimacy of the photo might suffer a bit, but your gear won't! – Chinmay Kanchi May 9 '13 at 18:37
  • Another idea might be to keep the enclosure wet, at least near the opening. That would further trap the dust before it could get inside. – AJ Henderson♦ May 9 '13 at 18:51
5

If your gear is going to be exposed to such fine particulates floating around in the air, you need an enclosure that is air tight. Weather sealing is not enough protection when the particles you are concerned about are small enough that air currents influence their motion more than gravity.

Any kind of enclosure that is rated for immersion in water should be more than adequate, and will allow you to spray the powder off before opening the enclosure and removing your camera. This would include rigid boxes designed for deeper diving as well as the sealed plastic bags with an integrated protection filter designed for use on or near the surface of water.

If you insist on using just a protective filter and a rain hood, be sure to use a fixed focal length lens or a zoom lens that uses internal focus and internal zoom elements that do not breathe. And stay far enough out of the action that your camera is not directly exposed to the powder bombs flying through the air.

Roger Cicala, the founder and chief technical lens guru at lensrentals.com, covers all of the above in greater detail in his blog entry titled, "How to Ruin Your (or Our) Gear in 5 Minutes (Without Water)."

|improve this answer
0

One thing that worries me is the breathing of a zoom, so I would restrain myself of using the zoom too much. Probably a fixed focal length lens in the case you are not really sure if your casing is really sealed.

|improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.