10
\$\begingroup\$

A friend of mine gave me a beautiful OM-1 with some lenses. The only caveat is that I don't have any batteries for it. The camera takes mercury batteries. I was wondering if there are any options to replacing it or modifying it so I can take advantage of the built-in light meter.

Improve this question
\$\endgroup\$

5 Answers 5

Reset to default
12
\$\begingroup\$

There are some warnings about using different types of non-mercury replacement batteries. In this flickr thread, there are a few suggestions:

  • Use the WeinCell MRB625 replacement battery for PX625/PX13. This is designed as a drop-in replacement for the OM-1, and even says so on the packaging.

  • Get 1.3V hearing-aid batteries from the drug store. Apparently they fit and work.

  • Use readily-available 1.5V lithium cells, but learn to read the meter as off or trick the camera by setting the ISO down by two stops. (That is, if you're using ISO 100 film, set it to 25; if you're using ISO 400, set it to 100.)

  • Get an adapter which converts 1.5V to 1.35V, like MR-9 Battery Adapter for Film Camera & Exposure Meter.

  • Have your OM-1 overhauled to take modern batteries.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ There is many hearing-aid batteries out there. I just want to confirm that I tried a 675. It works. It does not fit exactly because the diameter is smaller, but no contact problem. Don't know about longevity yet. A pack of 8 batteries for 12$, can't go wrong with that. \$\endgroup\$
    – Guillaume Bois
    Feb 3, 2021 at 2:45
4
\$\begingroup\$

I just dug out my old OM-1 recently and had the same problem. Here's the cheapest solution. I had some AG13 batteries I bought for VERY cheap a couple of years ago; 100 of them for not much, and I kept them in the fridge. Two days ago I put one of them in the OM-1 and folded a small bit of aluminum foil and stuffed it in on top of the battery and screwed on the cap. The meter worked!

Next, I did a test. Using the same target, at ISO-200 and 1/30th sec, the OM-1 meter centered at f 5.6.

Using the same settings and target, my Olympus OM-D E-M5 told me f 4.5. So about 1/2 f-stop difference. Not too shabby for 40 years' difference.

The AG13 is a very common item. Google "AG13 equivalent" and you'll find Energizer 357 and Duracell A76 and many more. Just drop in the battery flat side up, and fold a small piece of foil to take up the gap between the battery and the screw-cap, tight and flat enough that it can't shift and short out.

Then get a bulk order of AG13's like I did for MUCH cheaper. Maybe a few go bad and turn green around the edges after a year or two in the fridge. So what? Toss the ones that look bad, and get a decent battery tester that tests button batteries, and pack a few extras on a trip.

Surely you have a cheap or better modern digital camera you can use for similar tests? Try a bunch of the cheap batteries against tests on the same target with the digital, and look at the EXIF data compared to what works in the OM-1 without using film. Basically, the cheapo digital is working as an external light meter. Do that till you get confidence in your batteries before you use them on relatively expensive film, with it's attendant developing and printing costs. And may the Farce Bewitch you, aka good luck.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

I bought Panasonic PR44 batteries (replacement for 675) on Ali express, 6 of them for 3€, 1.4V, works well.

AliExpress Listing

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

I used 675 1,45 volt hearing aid batteries available at pharmacies and my local photography store. I took a piece of thick a4 paper, cut off a narrow ribbon, folded that in half to make the paper thicker and somewhat flexible in thickness and wrapped that around the battery to make it fit perfecty. in the camera container. I thought I'd use paper because it's non conductive. This is my first old camera and an experiment so your milage may vary :P It works so far!

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
-2
\$\begingroup\$

Out of all the answers I've seen on the internet I am boggled why no one has recommended a hand-held light meter. I've been using manual cameras for so long I seldom use my in-camera meter anyway. The only time I reach for my handheld meter is at night for long exposures. For creative night scenes you have to figure out the exposure yourself and bracket around that. Let's say you were at the beach at night and there was a couple on the beach embracing, the sun has gone down but the background was a beautiful orange yellowish color, so you decide to shoot the couple in silhouette, the camera is designed to give a correct exposure - the rest is for you to figure out. Bottom line, stop worrying about batteries or modification. Just go out and invest in a handheld meter, heck even the pros use them.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ It wasn't mentioned because the question was where to source replacement batteries, not asking for alternatives. Replacement battery is a small fraction of the cost of a light meter, which is just another thing to carry around. I own a light meter, but mainly only ever use it for portraits, would rarely carry it around with me. Built-in meter allows you to shoot in auto modes, can do accurate spot metering and is always with the camera. \$\endgroup\$
    – MikeW ♦
    Sep 22, 2015 at 1:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ Battery: £10 Light meter: £110 Sure, it's a nice idea, but does not solve the issue of wanting a battery for the built-in light meter! \$\endgroup\$
    – exception
    Apr 6, 2022 at 14:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.