Modern phase-detect sensors can focus in pretty low light. However, the limit for low light focusing tends to be reached much before the camera can no longer capture images using a high imaging sensor gain (ISO). I understand that, much like high ISO, the contrast is likely to reduce as gain is cranked up, but surely some AF is better than none, especially since focusing performance in good light should not be affected.

So why is this not universally the case? Why don't we have AF systems that can focus in near darkness?

  • \$\begingroup\$ -3 EV is near darkness to me :) and three cameras can focus that low: Pentax K-5 IIs, Pentax K-5 II and Canon EOS 6D. A few do -2 EV which is pretty dark too. \$\endgroup\$
    – Itai
    Commented Mar 12, 2013 at 2:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yeah, but handheld exposures are possible well below that with a highish ISO, say 6400 and above. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 12, 2013 at 3:02
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ I bet camera makers want the focus to be as close to spot on target as they can make it, thinking we would rather have it right or none at all, than getting out of focus photos every now and then. When camera refuses to focus in dim light, it is his way to tell you "focus manually, you owl!" and i think we should respect that. Every machine has a soul and he speaks to you. Bread toasters notwithstanding. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 12, 2013 at 6:01

1 Answer 1


Applying gain by increasing the ISO setting generally only serves to reduce read noise by amplifying the analogue signal before readout and digitization. Signal to noise ratio in the highlight remains unchanged. The increase in image brightness that also results would be irrelevant (besides any reduction in quantization noise) to the AF sensor, as it compares the pattern of brightness between two strips, the absolute value wont matter.

Read noise usually accumulates due to the transfer of the signal from a pixel on the sensor to an ADC chip, which is quite a long journey in some cases. The design of the AF sensor, with single strips of pixels facilitates a very short transfer with an ADC likely to be right on the sensor itself. This means read noise will be very low* and thus applying gain will be of no use.

The signal to noise ratio is pretty much determined by the amount of incoming light. When the signal to noise ratio is too low, phase detection simply wont work as the noise will be different across the two strips of pixels than make up the AF point, and the brightness values wont "match" even when in phase.

This is why you can't have AF sensors that focus in near darkness - reliability drops significantly. An AF sensor that refuses to focus is better than one that reports focus lock but then instructs the lens to focus at some totally random distance.

***** Performance characteristics of the AF sensor will be similar to the new Sony EXMOR image sensors (found in the Pentax K5 and Nikon D800 and others) which feature advanced noise cancellation and parallel ADCs and are regarded as being "ISO less" in that the noise obtained when pushing an ISO100 image two stops is the same as a native ISO400 exposure.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.