While searching for info about Sony SLT-A37 shutter lag (good results btw), I also read this question: Disadvantages of electronic viewfinders. There Itai said in a comment about the lag between action in front of camera and seeing it in EVF:

As stated, the lag is only a concern for action photography. Some are better than others. (...) Again, we are talking in the 10ths of a second, so not problematic for mostly still subjects.

So, my question is about this Viewfinder / Live View lag. Is there an internet site that has tested this lag? A search found the shutter lag test results easily enough, but no luck with this other kind of lag.

  • If a site were to capture that data, it probably would be @itai's site www.neocamera.com but I don't see it anywhere.
    – dpollitt
    Mar 11 '13 at 23:35
  • 2
    Unfortunately, I do not have this data. It is something noticeable but I do not have the technology to measure it. If one camera would have a faster EVF refresh rate it would most likely by the Olympus OM-D E-M5 because the sensor is read at 240Hz and the read-out speed puts a cap on lag.
    – Itai
    Mar 12 '13 at 2:44
  • Perhaps rear lcd lag could be captured with a high framerate videocamera pointed at a setup that includes a moving object, the camera to be tested with its display panel visible and a gate thru which the object will pass. Measuring the time that it takes for the object passing the gate show up on the camera display after the object did pass thru the gate in real. Now, one second split into 30 frames is 0,033 sec per frame, it seems the videocamera won't need to be such a high framerate device, any videocam should do the job. Mar 12 '13 at 10:29

I own a Sony A77 SLT camera.
I am an 'avid' photographer. As well as well composed and static shots I enjoy pushing the camera to its limits in various ways including situations where correct timing of shutter release is critical. Overall I am happy with the tradeoffs that come from the EVF system.

I am long accustomed to taking action shots with motion in them - either of moving objects, or photos from vehicles and similar. On occasions after taking a photo I notice that the image captured and what I was 'frozen' on the EVF display vary noticeably - there can be a distinct and sudden "jump" in the displayed image a small fraction of a second post capture. I do not know what conditions cause this to happen and I have been unable to replicate it in simple tests. I do not think it is a predominantly low light phenomena.

Despite the above, I do not ever feel that I am losing shots due to display lag or other similar aspects. I do not recall the above post capture jump ever resulting in a lost shot that would have otherwise succeeded. I'll keep a 'watching brief' on this, and if I learn more that's useful will update this answer.

Overall I am extremely happy with the abilities of the A700 as a "picture making system". I also use a Nikon D700 whose low light capabilities are significantly superior to those of the A77. Despite this, my camera of choice if I have to take only one with me is the A77. This is not related to the 12 vs 24 megapixel difference but essentially solely due to the ability of the constant live view (rear LCD & viewfinder), display reflecting actual result (unless disabled) and general responsiveness to better allow me to capture the photos I want to how I want them in dynamic real-life situations. (THe A77's articulating viewfinder is a very nice bonus). If there are viewfinder lag effects at work they do not diminish the overall experience to the extent that what was at one time essentially Nikon's flagship camera (now dated) becomes the better choice for me.


I made a quick-n-dirty test of rear LCD display lag myself. My friend came over with his Casio EX-F1 compact camera, which can record a video at 1200 fps. We shot a video of the Olympus SP-550 rear lcd panel at 300 fps and then slowed the result down to 1 fps. On the slowed video a one second represents 0,00333 second in real life. I had a Metz flash illuminate a piece of white paper from behind and both the Casio and Olympus pointed at the paper.

The flash goes off and 13 frames later it starts showing on Olympus rear display, taking 3 more frames to come to noticeable brightness. So, 16 frames x 0,00333 second is 0,053 second lag on the rear display of this old compact camera. (Repeated the test four times, variations noticed within +/- 1 frame)

Test video in YouTube

  • Good try. You also should know that the lag is variable. In low light cameras have to boost the gain which case the EVF/LCD image to be grainy but to avoiding too much grain they also often slow down the refresh rate which causes a longer lag. You also have to repeat any test a number of times (9 seems good and is what I normally use) to avoid variations depending on how movement coincides with a read-out cycle.
    – Itai
    Mar 12 '13 at 16:38
  • Thanks @Itai. Good to know about the low-light scene affecting lag. I don't think i'll repeat this test soon, but if i get my hands on a high-framerate videocam, a new test might be on the to-do list (having another camera to test by then). Mar 12 '13 at 17:32
  • 1
    Low light does affect the viewfinder view indeed. With my old point 'n shoot I encountered fps drops (of the viewfinder/screen). Camera's with live view as primary viewing mode usually do not lag a lot. Live view on normal dslr cameras is a bit more laggy in my opinion.
    – FW.
    Apr 2 '13 at 21:26

I found something about Sony SLT A77's viewfinder. It still repeats what @Itai said about varying refresh rates in different lightning conditions, but what I found interesting was what they said about lag in good light. It is hardly noticeable. A quote below (bolding done by me):

When not in continuous shooting mode, viewfinder responsiveness is a function of refresh rate; essentially the frame rate of the "live movie" that constitutes the viewfinder image. Specs for this are almost never published, in part because the refresh rate is usually a strong function of the amount of light falling on the camera's sensor. In dim lighting, the camera needs longer exposure times for each frame of the movie it's capturing and playing into the viewfinder display, setting an upper limit on the viewfinder's refresh rate. Indeed, as noted above, the Sony A77's refresh rate drops pretty dramatically when faced with very dim shooting conditions. (A trade off we're happy to accept, given that the resulting viewfinder image is much more visible than that from an optical viewfinder under similar circumstances.)

We don't have any way to measure the Sony A77's viewfinder refresh rate under bright lighting conditions, but our sense is that it's quite high: Motion was very smooth and fluid, and we had no sense of a delay or lag between the subject's motion and what we were seeing in the viewfinder. - source: Imaging Resource

Now, as there is no, and perhaps never will be, a reliable way to test electronic viewfinder display lag in varying conditions, I think this question is ready to be closed.

It is hard to say more than that there is some lag in dim light, and practically no lag with the best e-viewfinders in best conditions. Catching a moment that you have been waiting to photograph, your own human reaction time is the biggest lag there is.


I own a slt a35. The EVF lag is not actually as bad as it is on paper. I do not miss any BIF shots due to this. I am not a pro . Just an enthusiast

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.