I'm looking to buy a camera for my son to use for stop-motion animation. He has been using an old web cam, but he wants to step up in quality now. What features, eg. live view, resolution, etc, should I be looking for? I've looked at the Hue cameras but I'm not sure these will give the better results we're looking for. Of course, there's a budget, as he is just a teenager – I'd guess we wouldn't want to spend over about £100 at this stage.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Are you sure that a new camera will be the best thing to increase the quality of his stop motion works? It could also be lights, software, a tripod, ... Maybe you could add information in your question about what the results are lacking? \$\endgroup\$
    – Unapiedra
    Commented Mar 7, 2013 at 11:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ Meta-discussion on the topicality of stop-motion questions: meta.photo.stackexchange.com/q/3820/1943 \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Commented Mar 7, 2013 at 14:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for your speedy responses. It's definitely the quality of camera that I want to deal with initially, but I'm aware there will be other expenses, although we do already have a tripod. Lots to read and take in here. Many thanks all. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 8, 2013 at 9:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ There is pretty much nothing you can get for that budget, and even less if you want something with specialized stop-motion features. Keep using the webcam until you can afford something. \$\endgroup\$
    – Itai
    Commented Feb 3, 2018 at 15:26

5 Answers 5


You will get best results with the following features:

  • Tripod mount
  • Manual exposure mode
  • Manual focus

Additionally, things to consider:

  • Raw file format (so you can tweak the look). This is certainly not for everyone.
  • Tethered mode (this is what a web-camera is really good at...).

If your son is already using a webcam for stop-motion he is probably already using a certain software for doing so? If so maybe the software can control the webcam in focus and exposure. Then maybe getting a better webcam will be best. My webcam has very good quality and exposure and focus can be externally controlled.

Specific Solutions

In this answer to What is best for making stop motion animation - Digital camera or SLR? the suggestion was made to get good software first. I understand as a gift a tangible camera is nicer than intangible software. Also the software linked costs from $70. However, I am sure there are open source solutions for this (although I couldn't find one that allows manual focus).

Having had a look at stop motion pro Action HD ($140) and a Microsoft Lifecam HD Cinema ($???) or a Logitech C910 (I paid £60 through ebay 2 years ago) or C920, this solution would give good results on a low budget. In both cameras you can control exposure, focus and (Logitech only?) zoom from the software.

Do you need a need a better camera?

However, in all technical problems you can best improve things if you analyse what the greatest weakness is in your current solution. Without knowing the results you get I can only speculate:

  • Low image resultion (i.e. not HD) --> Only a better camera will help.
  • Noisy images --> Spend £1000 on a low noise DSLR or get cheap lightbulbs and put them close to your scene.
  • Flicker in the resulting video --> Manual exposure control (either software or camera)
  • Movements of objects look jerky --> Software solution with "onion skinnning" (that's what it's called) Many open source / free software solutions do this for you too.
  • Depth of Focus --> Have a look at what macro photographers do.

My recommendation is that you select the best camera your budget allows from the ones that work with Stop Motion Pro. You can see the list in their What camera should I use? page.

SMP is a PC application that controls the camera and gives you a live preview in your computer monitor. With this software you can shoot your animation from your computer, preview the animation as you are shooting it, see real-time onion skinning, review previous pictures and retake the ones that did not come out right, and much much more.

If your son isn't using Stop Motion Pro or similar yet, then you may want to evaluate if it makes more sense to give him the software and keep your webcam for a while. The visual quality will not improve much, but he'll have a lot of options to improve the quality of his animation, all skills that he'll be able to transfer to an upgraded camera in the future.

Good luck!


What you would want is a camera that has manual settings for ISO and exposure.

As the exposure time is not critical, you would want to set it to the lowest ISO setting to get the best image quality.

You would want to use the manual exposure setting so that you can take all the images in a sequence using the same exposure, so that you don't get a flicker when you put them together. Set the aperture (f-stop) to the value where the lens gives the best image, and let the exposure time be as long as needed.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Which camera below £100 has a lens with adjustable aperture? \$\endgroup\$
    – Unapiedra
    Commented Mar 7, 2013 at 11:49
  • \$\begingroup\$ Is ISO at HD resolution that important? A well lit scene will not cause problems with high noise and getting enough light to a scene is easy in macro environments (inverse square law and all that). If the son is not doing macro-stop motion than lighting might be an issue. \$\endgroup\$
    – Unapiedra
    Commented Mar 7, 2013 at 11:53

You probably want an interchangeable lens camera with the ability to set ISO, aperture, shutter speed, and focus manually. This rules out cheap point-and-shoots, and includes any DSLR or mirrorless on the market today.

Having a larger sensor (as in those DSLR and mirrorless cameras over a point-and-shoot or phone camera) can give a low-light advantage, but since you don't actually have any motion going on, and since you can control the light in your stop-motion environment (right?), this is less important than it is in many other cases. You should be able to get great results from a wide variety of cameras in this situation. On a larger-sensor camera, you'll want to stop the aperture down anyway, to make sure you don't have that miniature-scene razor-thin depth of field.

But there are two things I think are really essential:

  • Tethering or a wifi solution, with remote live-view. You're going to want to mount your camera to a tripod (or, more likely, to something like Manfrotto's 3-section articulated arm and super clamp), and this will let you control the camera without awkwardly peering at the back and poking at buttons at the risk of moving the camera and ruining the whole sequence. Whether you need a connection to a PC or laptop or are content with a phone app is up to you.
  • Electronic shutter. If you're making a movie of beyond a minute or two, you're putting a lot of wear on a mechanical shutter and will eventually need to replace it. This will cost several hundred dollars. Using an electronic shutter avoids this. This is the only option for most point-and-shoot cameras anyway. It's often a selectable option for mirrorless cameras; most DSLRs today only use mechanical shutter (see Do DSLRs allow use of electronic shutter for photography for stop-motion?.)

So, in short: a low-end mirrorless interchangeable lens camera with wifi tethering should hit these points. (It will also have RAW capture mode and the manual control mentioned in other answers.)

  • \$\begingroup\$ Also, just in case one is using a DSLR, Nikons that don't support and/or aren't using one of E-type (electronically-controlled aperture) lenses are less desirable that other DSLR brands that electronically control aperture. Non-E lenses use a physical aperture control linkage to open the iris. This linkage mechanism is prone to slight frame-to-frame inconsistency, requiring more work in post to normalize the exposure for all the frames in a scene or sequence. \$\endgroup\$
    – scottbb
    Commented Jul 30, 2017 at 16:08

First, I don't do stop-motion videos, but I'm very fond of it. There's only a small one I did though. So, at your budget I think it would be a compact (unless you found a really good second hand DSLR)

As others have mentioned, you would definitely need manual controls like aperture, ISO, Shutter. And I think it would be nice to have a zoom level around 8×. And I think you may want a macro focusing distance of less than 5cm. And, the most irritating thing my camera has is every time I went to review the image that I just took, it retracted the lens back to the body and we cannot shut that off. So, I strongly recommend you to beware of that.

And, I don't know the grid display is just a feature that every camera has, so....

And I recently saw one camera had a feature just for the stop-motion that the camera displays the previously taken photo overlayed on top of the live image view.

I used a free software called MonkeyJam to create the above clip btw. And though I didn't worry that much about lighting for that one, I think one or two lamps and something like this ↓ would be somewhat helpful (A mirror attached to piece of wood went through an old lens's cap (the mirror's tilt is adjustable))

enter image description here


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.