I just received a 35mm f/1.8 DX lens for my Nikon D50 for Christmas, and took some shots where the lights on the tree were the main source of illumination. Almost all of them exhibit very prominent green after-images of the tree lights. For example, in this image they run from the left side of the mirror down to the left side of the fireplace:

Tree with green lights

Are these artifacts caused by the lens, the camera, the filter (a Tiffen 52mm UV protector), or a combination of them? How can I avoid them in future shots?

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Try removing the UV filter, it might generate the lens flares. \$\endgroup\$ Dec 25, 2012 at 21:50
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ omg!! aliens!! :O \$\endgroup\$
    – Sid
    Dec 26, 2012 at 11:24

3 Answers 3


The UV filter likely explains this.

As I've explained in this answer, any filter will degrade image quality, but some do so more than others. Tiffen filters do not have anti-reflective coatings and are thus prone to flare. You should either remove the filter or use a high-quality one from a brand like B+W or Hoya.


Those are almost certainly reflections from the UV filter. I recommend taking it off.

This is a topic of much debate, but the fact is filters do cause artifacts visible in your photos — you've got the evidence right there. You can get better results from a more expensive filter, but then it'll cost almost as much as your lens. Lenses aren't as fragile as they seem. Just be careful, use a lens hood, and put the lens cap on when you're not shooting.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Just try the same shot with the UV filter removed. If it fixes the next shots, you know it was the cause. You avoid problems caused by a UV filter by using a lens hood instead. \$\endgroup\$ Dec 25, 2012 at 23:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ The green dots... looks like the Christmas tree is being reflected back :D \$\endgroup\$ Dec 26, 2012 at 2:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Peng — Yes. The lights from the Christmas tree bounced by the filter. \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Dec 26, 2012 at 3:14
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I add, "except at the beach". Weigh the risk as well as the cost of a lens. \$\endgroup\$
    – JDługosz
    Dec 16, 2014 at 9:43

it's definitely the filter, even my 30 dollar hoya does this in low light, it really screwed up some pics before.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.