As we are all aware, the more blades there are in a lens’s diaphragm, the rounder the resulting hole can be made, and in turn this gives a more natural looking bokeh.

So on receiving my recent Hasselblad Carl Zeiss distagon 4/50 lens, i was rather, well, confused, to see that it has a straight-cut 5-blase diaphragm, basically leaving you with a pentagonal hole as an aperture...

I have yet to compare its results to my 9-blade Nikkor 50mm 1.4f, which has a "near as damn it" circular aperture at all f-stops, so I want to know, is this decision for a particular reason? does it give a certain "zeiss look"? Its certainly not a technical limitation of its age.

(For reference the lens was made in 1985)


Believe it or not, this fascination with "good bokeh" is a relatively recent phenomenon, at least outside of Japan. The first indication I ever saw of it as "a thing" was when the Minolta 135 f/2.8 [T 4.5] STF was released (admittedly, it goes a little further down the "good bokeh" road than any other lens). When I took up photography, doing things with the pentagonal or hexagonal aperture shape (especially with flare) was the trendy thing to do.

  • 1
    I await the day when photo blogs are abuzz with the hot new phenomenon of bee-hive bokeh :) – ElendilTheTall Aug 27 '12 at 17:29
  • 2
    Ah, the endless wealth of knowledge that streams forth from Stan's brain...I love these little tidbits of lore! :) +1 – jrista Aug 27 '12 at 18:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.