I absolutely love the simple and clean interface and features that iPhoto and Aperture bring and I absolutely hate the "library/import" approach. I like to see my photos as files on a disk and that's that. Is it possible to just navigate through a drive in iPhoto and open images for editing or do I always have to import stuff?

  • I had the same feelings, which was what led me to go with Lightroom instead.
    – chills42
    Aug 11 '12 at 4:13

You have to do the imports. The systems need to set up all of their information about the images somehow, after all.

So, start the imports and go do something else for a while. You're not required to sit and watch the imports. Let the computer do its thing, and then come back later when it's done.


Although storing your photos in folders is fast and simple, you can't place one photo into two folders without making file duplicates. And thus locating the necessary images might require more time.

So economy in a stage of image library classification will leads in loosing time in finding images later.


In Aperture, at least, you can import photos into the database but leave the files where they are. In the Import settings (when you click on the "Import" button), choose Store Files: In their current location (instead of "In the Aperture Library").


I am with you entirely. I hate having to do an import. I don't mind pointing an application at a folder that I have laid out. I can further sort within the app, add tagging, etc. But it had better not move my photos around.

I don't know of any way to do what you want with iPhoto.

Lightroom does indeed support a "folder" approach where that folder and everything under it is in the app for you to work on.

  • Is there any way to disable the "collection" feature in Lightroom?
    – antonpug
    Aug 11 '12 at 22:58
  • @antonpug - Lightroom can do an import-in-place. It's one of the import options.
    – Fake Name
    Aug 12 '12 at 22:53

Aperture yes as "referenced masters" — iPhoto no, it only supports its own library structure.

Aperture allows you to import photos as "referenced masters". You can do this from the import settings under the "Aperture Library" settings, by setting "Store Files" to "In their current location" (if already on your hard drive in your own storage system), or by selecting the appropriate folder for your folder-based-library. Note that you can also use the "Rename Files" setting to set up sub-folders (e.g. "YYYY/MMM/DD") as well as renaming the files as they're copied to the folder-based-library.

The same setting exists for "Import Folders as Projects" if you already have a project-based folder structure for your master photos.

Note that only the masters are getting stored in this structure, so you'll still need Aperture to browse your modified/processed images (unless you export to another folder structure).


If you don't want to import the photos, then select them by pressing Command-A then on the drop down menu select quick view. This will allow you to view them using the left and right arrows and you won't import them. Sweet

  • 1
    Yes, but that lets you just view them right? Does it allow you to edit them. I think the point of the question is to be able to use the full functionality of iPhoto or Aperture without the import step. Not just a slideshow of the images.
    – MikeW
    Jun 14 '15 at 6:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.