3

I have a

AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

and am planning to buy this

AF NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8D

does that make any sense? I'm interested in taking pictures that has lot of DoF.

Something like these...

17 Beautiful Images with Shallow Depth of Field

|improve this question
2

Short answer: Yes.

Long answer: You can still get the shallow DoF look with any lens by doing any combination of the following: focusing close/decreasing working distance, ensuring the background is far away, and increasing the focal length.

http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

You can even take it to the extreme and get very close, more than your intended composition, and stitch:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/carpeicthus/2922047522/

http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNK1JWPN65CVOSZV/

|improve this answer
  • I agree the long answer.. but sometimes if I want to take picture of a small plant that has a flower. I don't get that flexibility to move around much.. because of the height of plant. – Broken Link Aug 5 '10 at 22:00
4

The 50mm 1.8 is an excellent choice for small DoF type pictures, as well as many other types of pictures. The large aperture makes it a good lens for low light situations, and the focal length is ideally suited for portraits. For the price, it is an unbeatable lens that should be in any camera bag. A strong buy recommendation from me.

|improve this answer
  • Seconded. I bought this lens for an old film camera, but it rarely comes off my D90 now. It's not AF-S though, so you'll want to make sure it'll autofocus on your camera if that's important to you. – LnxPrgr3 Oct 11 '10 at 14:29
2

if you're using the 18-200 dx, it means you don't use a full frame body. therefore, remember the 1.5 factor. so, the equivalent lens of what you want is the 35mm 1.8. this will give you a 'real' 50mm focal length. also notice that the 50mm doesn't autofocus (no inner engine) and therefore won't autofocus on d40/x/60, only on d80/90/200 etc. this might be even more relevant when shooting with small F number, since focus misses are more likely to occur.

|improve this answer
  • 1
    He doesn't say that he is looking for a lens with a 50mm equivalent FoV, he says he wants shallow DoF. Thus, a 50mm f1.8 will give shallower DoF compared to a 35mm f1.8. – Eruditass Aug 6 '10 at 0:30
2

There are two key specifications of a lens that determine the depth of field, the focal length and the aperture. (There are other factors such as distance from the subject and sensor size, but those are not directly tied to the lens).

In general, to get a really shallow depth of field you want a wide aperture (low f value) and a long focal length, then have your subject fairly close. Obviously there are some limits to that, and framing your shot correctly is more important that limiting the DOF.

The 50mm 1.8 is going to have a much narrower depth of field that the 18-200, because you have at least 2 full f-stops difference in aperture size, which will allow you a lot more flexibility.

Also, when you are researching a lens with shallow depth of field in mind, look at the number of "Diaphragm Blades". This is not directly linked, but bokeh is very important with a shallow dof, and the higher the number of blades, the smoother your background can be.

|improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.