Viewfinders (both optical and electronic) typically come with two stats: magnification and coverage. The latter measuring how much of the actual exposed area (film or sensor) one sees. But what is magnification?


1 Answer 1


The magnification is not a solitary measurement; in the case of optical SLR viewfinders in 35mm-format or APS-C, it's usually stated as "magnification with a 50mm lens focused at infinity" with the standard viewfinder optic diopter setting (no user correction applied).

It's only when all of those factors are taken into consideration: the focal length of the lens (which can be changed with the focus distance even without zooming, depending on the lens design) and the viewfinder diopter (adjustments for negative diopter correction will make the viewfinder image appear smaller, and positive will make it appear larger) that you can talk about magnification. And then it's pretty simple -- it's the apparent size of what you see through the viewfinder compared to what you'd see with the naked eye.

Ideally, I suppose, you'd want 1x (1:1) magnification with a normal lens so that when you're living the single-lens lifestyle you can easily shoot with both eyes open and everything matching in both eyes. That will almost always lead to some vignetting of the screen, though, and make the in-viewfinder data areas almost impossible to see without shifting your eyes around the finder's viewport. For this reason, the magnification is usually slightly less than 1x. (Some very-high-eyepoint finders, especially the lovely optional "sports finder" for the late, lamented Canon F1n, can be 1x or larger—but you could look through that sucker with both eyes.)

And because you're spreading a smaller amount of light over a larger area, a given magnification (with a purely optical system) will be significantly dimmer for a small sensor than it would be for a larger one (since the focusing screen is the same size, roughly, as the sensor). That's why, all else being equal (same screen design, same prism design and materials, etc.), a full-frame 35mm-format DSLR's viewfinder will be brighter than an APS-C's with the same magnification spec.

Electronic viewfinders, of course, can always pump up the brightness to compensate for the image magnification, but they still have to allow for the viewport problem in an eye-level finder—a 1:1 picture in the viewfinder is only helpful if you can see the whole thing.

The actual magnification of the viewfinder image will change, of course, when you change lenses or zoom. The specification, though, will give you some idea of the apparent size of the focusing screen -- a larger number means you will see a bigger picture through the viewfinder, and that can make composition a lot easier.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Does magnification change linearly with focal length? That is, can one translate the manufacturer's given viewfinder magnification at 50mm on APS-C to that at an APS-C normal field of view simply by dividing? \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Commented Feb 25, 2012 at 16:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ You would need to know the full magnification specification (which focal length is specified, etc., for the number given), but yes, the difference would be as linear as the field of view at the sensor. The focal length in the spec number would be the denominator, of course, with the actual focal length in use as the numerator. Thus, a 200mm lens used on a camera that claims a 0.95x magnification with a 50mm lens would show you the world at 3.8x life size through the viewfinder, while a 14mm lens would give you a Lilliputian 0.266x view. \$\endgroup\$
    – user2719
    Commented Feb 25, 2012 at 17:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ @mattdm -- I hope I haven't misunderstood your question. The viewfinder magnification spec is a spec—it doesn't change—but the size of the world viewed through the viewfinder can be calculated based on the lens you're using. It's the "normal field of view" that's ambiguous; one could argue that the "normal field of view" is a crop of a larger picture. If you mean using a 30-35mm lens (as appropriate for the brand), then, yes, you can divide the actual lens by the spec lens to get the magnification f the wider world. \$\endgroup\$
    – user2719
    Commented Feb 25, 2012 at 18:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ So if it scales linearly, and my camera shows 1:1 at 70mm, does that mean it actually has a 0.71x magnification at 50mm? \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael
    Commented Feb 27, 2017 at 18:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.