I'm thinking of starting some amateur macro photography, and I'm not sure I want to go with macro lenses, due to their price.

I currently have the following lenses:

  • Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
  • Canon EF 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

And I was thinking of buying either:

  • Macro Extension Tube
  • Reverse Adapter

My questions are:

  1. What is the difference between the tube and the reverse-ring if I want to use one of my lenses for macro?
  2. How important is auto-focus in macro-photography?
  3. How important is the ability to change the aperture macro-photography?

2 Answers 2


The answer to your first question is answered here. Both are good low-cost ways to get started in macro photography.

Autofocus is not very effective as you near 1:1 magnification. Most AF systems will struggle to find focus, you have such a narrow DOF anyway that holding focus is very hard. With anything that is not moving, you are far better to set up a tripod and use live view to focus, if you have it. Or manually focus, then move the camera to and fro to get the subject in focus.

If you have a macro lens, you may not use it at 1:1 as often as you think, in which case AF can be very handy. I use it when shooting bees - it's very hit and miss, but for me slightly more successful than manual focus.

If you use extension tubes or reversal ring, you will be forced to be a certain range of distance from your subject (you can no longer focus over a wide range of distances), so AF is not really useful at all.

Aperture is important. You have a very narrow DOF, so you will often want to stop down in order to get as much DOF as possible. Or if you are shooting hand-held you may need a wide open aperture to avoid blur. If you reverse a lens, or have manual extension tubes and aren't able to control aperture, it's not a killer blow, but it isn't ideal.


Extension tube (ET) versus reverse adaptor (RA):

A RA is cheaper, but you will probably have a "fixed focus" and therefore, fixed reproduction ratio -- at least on your 50mm. On some zoom lenses, the zoom ring can change the focus distance when reversed, but image quality may be poor. Reversed lenses often exhibit a notable lack of flatness of field. This may be important if you are shooting (for example) postage stamps, but a spherical focus field may actually be useful if shooting the insides of a flower, for example.

ETs are more expensive, but more versatile. You may even be able to get very expensive ones that will allow auto-focusing to work. But really, buy the cheap ones and plan to do manual focusing. Advantages: manual focus ring still works, and with your 50mm lens (at least) you can have a continuous range of reproduction ratios with three extension tubes.

Another consideration might be a bellows -- like having a continuously-variable-length extension tube. You can sometimes find these used for not much more than the cost of a set of tubes. Disadvantages: the generally don't communicate automatic aperture info, and at their thinnest setting, are still longer (smaller reproduction ratio) than the thinnest extension tube.

If you're a technical sort of person and especially if you want to do flat-field macro, go for the tubes or bellows. If you're an artsy person and saving money is really important, start off with the reverse adaptor, knowing its limitations.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.