Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I guess this is more a question of optics than photography but I just got an SLR with a basic 18-55 lens. I noticed that when going from 18 to 55 or 55 to 18 the lens physically comes back in and then physically goes back out?
What is going on there? I would think that if I am zooming in the lens should be going out 100% of the time but the lens actually goes out and then comes back in.
There is no simple relationship between the physical length of the lens and its focal length. For example, a retrofocus wide angle is generally longer than its focal length, while a telephoto lens is shorter than its focal length. Inside a zoom, you have several lens groups that move independently. The focal length of the zoom depends on the relative positions of the groups, and is not always simply related to the physical length of the lens. That being said, the simplest possible explanation for this behavior is that your zoom may be of a simple retrofocus design.
A retrofocus zoom is made of only two groups. The front group, of negative refractive power and (negative) focal distance f1, makes a virtual intermediate image of the object somewhere in front of the lens. This group works much like the glasses short-sighted people wear: it brings the object “closer to the eye”. The focal length of this group is close to -35 mm.
The rear group, of positive refractive power, makes on the sensor an inverted real image of this intermediate virtual image. The intermediate image is the “object” for this group. The final image is like an inverted copy of the virtual image, scaled by a magnification factor m2 close to -1, which is negative because the final image is inverted.
Assuming the object is at infinity, the whole lens has a focal length f = f1×m2. This is a product of two negative numbers, and the result is positive.
In the above simplified drawing, the first group is the lens L1, the second group is the lens L2, the zoom is focused at infinity, the intermediate image is at the left, at a distance x from L2, and the sensor is at P. The magnification of L2 is m2=-x’/x.
With this design, it is easy to zoom the lens by moving the second group. When this group is closer to the sensor, it provides a small magnification (say around -0.5) and thus a shorter focal length for the whole lens. When it is moved forward, closer to the intermediate image, you have higher magnification (say around -1.6) and thus a longer focal length for the whole lens.
However, as you change the magnification of this group, the distance between the object (in this case the intermediate image) and the final image changes. This distance is at a minimum when the group is just in between its object and its image, which happens when the magnification is -1. You can check this easily by using a magnifying glass to focus the image of a lightbulb on a piece of paper: the distance between the the bulb and the focused image is minimal when the image has the same size as the object. In the case of the zoom lens, since the final image has to fall at a fixed position (on the sensor), the intermediate image has to be moved by moving the front group. This explains the observed behavior of the front group: as you zoom the lens from 18 mm to ~35 mm, the magnification m2 goes from ~-0.5 to -1 and the front group moves closer to the sensor. As you zoom from there to 55 mm, m2 goes from -1 to ~-1.6 and the front group moves away from the sensor.
This is just a theoretical (over)simplified model for a zoom where each group is just a thin lens. The focal lengths of the groups are -35 mm (front group) and +35 mm (rear group). Assuming an object at infinity, I calculated the configurations of the zoom for three focal lengths. The table below shows the positions of the lens elements (in mm from the sensor) as a function of the focal length the zoom is set to:
┌───────────┬─────────┬─────────┐
│ f. length │ group 1 │ group 2 │
├───────────┼─────────┼─────────┤
│ 18 mm │ 121.1 │ 53 │
│ 35 mm │ 105 │ 70 │
│ 55 mm │ 112.3 │ 90 │
└───────────┴─────────┴─────────┘
And here is a drawing, to scale:
The sensor is at the right. The intermediate image (not drawn) is 35 mm to the left of the front element. The interesting thing is that the movements of the groups (both front and rear) match what I've seen on most small mid-range zooms. A real zoom may have more groups (IS has been mentioned), but only two are really needed for the zoom action.
For a more realistic example, see this patent for some Nikon 1 zooms. It's not the best example because these lenses are intended for a mirrorless camera. However, one of the embodiments is a 10-30 mm midrange zoom (27-81 equiv.), quite close in range to a 18-55 for 1.6×.
I like this example though because of the figures. Please take a look at the figure on page 1, and more specifically at the arrows at the bottom, below the labels “G1” and “G2”. These arrows show the way the groups move when the lens is zoomed from wide (W) to tele (T). You can see that the front group moves back and then forward, while the second group moves monotonously forward. That's what I have seen on many wide and midrange zooms, although not on all of them (not on the Nikkor 18-70 for example). You may notice that the second group has some subgroups among it, including one group for focusing (Gf) and one group for image stabilization (Gs). These subgroups are however irrelevant when one considers only the zooming action.
Anyway, the interesting thing here is that, although some of the provided examples have three lens groups, most (including the “preferred embodiment”) only have two. Quoting the patent (paragraph 077 on page 67):
An optical system according to the present embodiment includes, in order from an object side, a first lens group having negative refractive power, and a second lens group having positive refractive power.
This is exactly the description of a retrofocus lens.
Here is another patent from Nikon which may be more relevant since it mostly describes the 18-55 kind of APS-C zooms.
Examples 1 and 2 of this patent are for such a simple retrofocus design, with a front group of focal length -31.51 mm and a rear group of focal length +37.95 mm. From the data tables we see that, as you zoom the lens from 18 to 55 mm, the front group moves first back (towards the sensor) and then forward (away from the sensor) while the rear group moves monotonously forward.
This patent shows also that the simple two-group design I am describing here is not the only possible option. Consider the example 5 of this patent. This lens has four groups that move all in different ways as the lens is zoomed. When zooming from 18 to 55 mm, the front group moves back, then forward, and the rear group moves monotonously forward. Thus, as seen from the outside, it looks like the simple two-group design of example 1, although internally it is quite more complex.
On the other hand, this particular design is actually not that far from the simple retrofocus design. If we say that groups 2, 3 and 4 constitute a sort of “super-group”, then the lens can be described as a group (G1) of negative refractive power followed by the super-group (G234) of positive refractive power. Still kind of a retrofocus. This description is not completely unreasonable as groups 2, 3 and 4 move more or less in the same fashion: they all move monotonously forward as the lens is zoomed from wide to tele, and their average movement is greater than the relative movements between them. From the table of lens data I calculated the focal length of this super-group and found that it does not change a lot: only from 38.6 mm at the wide end of the zoom to 34.8 mm at the tele end.
Although I have only investigated a few patents, my conclusion is that some sort of retrofocus design (but not necessarily with only two groups) is likely on a zoom if the following three conditions are met:
The first condition is likely to be always met by SLR zooms having a maximum focal length of no more than 55 mm.
PS: This answer has been heavily edited in order to better merge several edits. In the process I incorporated an important point raised by Stan Rogers, namely that the simple design is not the only possible design.
See edit note below this answer.
The lens is retrofocal at the wide end and telephoto at the long end. A retrofocus lens is referred to as "inverted telephoto" because it is constructed similarly to a telephoto lens with the elements reversed. The effect decreases as you zoom in, until you reach about 35mm, at which the lens begins to extend and eventually becomes a telephoto configuration, where the size of the lens, front element to rear element, is less than the focal length. The lens is neither retrofocal nor telephoto between these positions. This results in the lens being longer at the extremes of the zoom range than at intermediate positions.
For more information on this design, see the Wikipedia articles on Angénieux retrofocus, which discusses the origin of the design for the wide end, and telephoto lens for what happens at the long end. According to the telephoto lens article:
Zoom lenses that are telephotos at one extreme of the zoom range and retrofocus at the other are now common.
This is essentially what is happening with your 18-55mm lens. As far as I am aware, Canon, Nikon, Pentax, and Sony (A-mount, not E-mount) 18-55mm lenses all share this design aspect.
Edit: This answer is incorrect because it is based on an incorrect definition of "telephoto lens". Please disregard this answer; Edgar Bonet's answer is likely to be correct. See https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22633/160017.
With most zoom lens designs as you zoom in, the lens barrel and front element will extend, that is true.
But there are some lenses like the Canon EF 24-70 where the lens is fully extended at 24mm and fully retracted at 70mm. So judging by the front elements, it seems to be working backwards!
And there are IZ (internal zoom) lenses where the front element doesn't move at all.
Any lens will have many groups of elements, some of which will be moving "out" and others moving "in". I guess the simple answer is you can't just judge by what you see the barrel and front element doing, there is a lot more going on inside. Some lens designs are very complicated. I'll be very interested if someone can post a simple picture to explain how this particular lens design works.
