My daughter has a Nikon D-90 camera body and two prime f1.4 lenses 50mm and 35mm. She is interested in learning more, and I am curious which of a zoom or fixed telephoto lens would help her best? Is getting a low f-stop lens important in a telephoto lens?


4 Answers 4


It depends on where she's feeling the limitations. I have a kit made up of 15mm, 40mm, and 70mm prime lenses (on a dSLR with the same 1.5× format as the Nikon D90), and for me, that's just about right. (I'd probably trade the 40mm for a 35mm were I starting over — tough call.) For my style, I don't miss having a zoom at all.

Since she has (and is presumably comfortable with) two prime lenses, she may feel the same way, and would just like to increase the range of focal lengths she has available. For that, another prime covering either wider-angle or more telephoto would fit nicely.

On the other hand, she might want to explore the convenience of a zoom. Having flexibility of framing can remove one-more-thing-to-worry-about from the learning process, and remove the potential need to switch lenses in the middle of the action.

Back on the first hand, though, there is a school of thought which argues that prime lenses have inherent advantages for learning composition. Mike Johnston's Case Against Zooms articulates this view well. The idea is that by learning to know a particular prime lens's inherent viewpoint, that limitation actually becomes a freedom.

Since I use my 40mm most often, I can attest to this: having used it to take thousands of photographs over the course of several years, I can know what photo my camera will make without having to actually put it to my eye. That's very useful, and helps me concentrate on taking the photographs I want to take with the view I want to have.

  • +1 Love the point you make in the last paragraph about being able to know the probable composition without needing to bring the camera to your eye.
    – jrista
    Nov 21, 2011 at 4:31
  • 1
    Johnston does admit usefulness of zoom lenses in telephoto range though.
    – Imre
    Nov 21, 2011 at 4:36
  • Yeah I don't think anyone is saying zooms are useless. I'm not, certainly. They just don't fit certain styles of photography, and primes do have a few advantages for learning.
    – mattdm
    Nov 21, 2011 at 12:27
  • By the same token, zooms also have some advantages for learning. A simple exercise such as photographing the same subject and foreground/background using a zoom set at different focal lengths from different distances to frame the subject the same size can teach a LOT about how shooting distance relates to perspective, as well as about focal length selection based on what you want the image to look like. It's much more economical to do this with a "kit" zoom than with a set of 4-5 primes.
    – Michael C
    Dec 17, 2018 at 19:30
  • Zooms also are an economical way to expose a beginner to using multiple focal lengths and allow them to find which ones they might desire to spend more on for a higher quality prime.
    – Michael C
    Dec 17, 2018 at 19:32

If you are interested in learning a certain type of photography such as birding, then a telephoto would be what you are looking for. If you already have general purpose prime lenses, a general purpose zoom pretty much achieves a similar goal, just with a more convenient package.

Stickily speaking, if learning is your goal, exposing yourself to as many different types of lenses as possible might be the best. You may want to try a 100mm macro, a 70-200mm zoom, or a 18-55mm zoom. These are all pretty standard and will give opportunities that your current kit does not allow.


When I was learning, I used a 50mm f/1.7 on a Minolta SLR. It was a great learning lens for so many reasons.

It helped learn composition because I had to think while I shot -- I moved closer to or away from subjects rather than simply zooming in and out.

It was bright and fast so I could shoot easily in dark locations

I was forced to concentrate on focusing, especially when shooting at wide apertures

I could invoke shallow depth of field, something hard to do on a "slower" lens

The photos always looked so sharp and contrasty, because the prime lens provided such good image quality

Now, I'm really picky about lenses, and part of it was due to my finding out how poor the quality of a large range zoom could be. I would recommend learning on a 50mm prime any day of the week.

  • And now, on my EOS digital, I love using old Pentax lenses. My favorite is a 50mm f/1.4 Super Takumar. Lots of fun and great for learning the way "it used to be". Check out this video to see how nice it can be Nov 24, 2011 at 3:14
  • 2
    That's nice but the person in question already has 50mm f/1.4 (and 35 f/1.4), what should she get next?
    – Imre
    Nov 24, 2011 at 8:54
  • Modern zooms are a LOT better than their counterparts back when a 50mm f/1.8 (or 1.7) was the standard "kit" lens!
    – Michael C
    Dec 17, 2018 at 19:25

Would a fixed or zoom telephoto lens be better for learning?


There are lessons about perspective, field of view, narrow depth of field, framing, and composition that can best be learned by working with a prime lens and having to actively consider the best shooting position to get the shot you envision. The fixed focal length forces you to move to alter the framing of the subject, but that doesn't mean you have to or even should stop moving to alter your composition if you add a zoom lens into the mix.

There are other lessons about perspective, field of view, framing, and composition that can best be learned with a zoom lens. A zoom gives you the opportunity, for example, to explore how the same subject looks in relation to the same foreground/background when shot from different distances at different focal lengths using the same framing of the main subject. In such an exercise you are zooming with both your feet and your lens in opposite directions and comparing the results!

The advice many give to learn to "zoom with your feet" before using a zoom lens is primarily a warning not to stand in one place and stop exploring shooting angles and perspectives if you were to have a zoom lens mounted on your camera. But just because you are using a zoom lens doesn't mean you can't still alter the composition of your photographs by using your feet!

Can you learn a lot as a beginner using only primes (or only zooms)? Absolutely. But you won't be as well rounded a photographer. Ultimately, I think to be a well rounded photographer you need to have the skill sets to use both prime lenses and zoom lenses in appropriate situations as well as the ability to assess when each is the better choice. Whether shooting with prime or zoom lenses, the key is to avoid becoming stuck in a rut (or in one spot) but rather to keep exploring new ways of seeing the world through your viewfinder.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.