Will a 35mm lens work for great indoor pictures of my kids?

Question

I just purchased the Nikon D5100 DSLR. The kit lens that came with it (18-55mm vr) is great when shooting outdoors, but once I try to take indoor pictures of my kids, the images aren't that good. Is the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX Lens good for shooting kids indoors in low light? My kids don't sit still either (2.5-year-old twins) so I need something that will allow for movement as well.

I'm new to photography, and this is my first DSLR, so I'm a little lost on all the terminology, which lens is for what, etc.

Answer 1

Yes - but for indoor shots of fast moving kids, I'd highly recommend a good flash first. You'll be guaranteed to freeze that motion regardless of the lens.

Indoors, in low light, with fast moving subjects - I'd choose a flash over a f/1.8 lens. With that lens, you'd still have to crank your ISO considerably to get motion freezing results, but a flash will do it everytime at whatever ISO you want. (Luckily, the D5100 does have pretty decent high ISO capabilities.)

Try not to associate flash with that cheesy popup thing on your camera. Even a SB-400 pointed at the ceiling to diffuse would be a serious step up and MUCH better.

I'm not knocking the 35mm lens - I think you should get it (optically and in everyway, its very much worth the price), but for freezing shots of kids indoors, a flash rules.

Answer 2

Yes, it probably will:

1. The focal length is good for restricted indoor spaces (as you probably know from shooting with your kit lens)

2. The aperture is great so you can do low light shots in much faster speed than with the kit. You mentioned that your kids are moving a lot. In this situation (subject motion) the image stabilizer that you have on the kit lens does not really help.

3. Being a prime lens the optical quality of the images will be superior compared to the kit lens. The bigger aperture will let you create more appealing portraits with much more blurred background.

Note that even though this is a fast lens, it may not be enough if the light is too dim. You may end up wishing you had a good flash after all. FWIW, this is a good investment, as a complement to a good lens or as a standalone purchase.

Answer 3

Photographing kids indoors is very often a nightmare but a 35mm f/1.8 would be a good lens to use. The large aperture will give faster shutter speeds for the available light and in a well lit room or near a window you will probably get away without flash and the focal length is good for restricted indoor spaces especially on a crop sensor body. If you really want to get good indoor shots of kids though you need to consider a flash. The one built into the camera will be of limited use as it will give a very harsh focused light that will not give you good results and in my experience kids hate them. You need a flash unit which allows you to bounce the light off the ceiling or a wall, something like an SB-400 which mounts on top of the camera allows you to angle the flash so that it does not directly illuminate the subject but bounces off a surface, hence the term bounce flash. This will give an even illumination without the harsh shadows behind the subject that the built in flash produces.

Answer 4

Yes, for low (available) light work with the Nikon D5100, the Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 is a very good lens. However, as others have said, for sharp images of fast-moving subjects (such as kids at play), a good Nikon SB flash unit is indispensable, and will give much more versatility than the built-in pop-up flash. For still-life, product, or street photography, that 35mm lens would be excellent! Have fun!