I want to buy D3100 with lens, but I'm not sure I understand the difference between these 2:

  1. AF-S DX 18-55mm 3.5-5.6G ED II (VBA280K002) - 480€
  2. AF-S VR DX 18-55mm 3.5-5.6G (VBA280K001) - 460€

VR stands for vibration reduction and ED for extra-low dispresion, or am I wrong? Which one is the better buy?


2 Answers 2


The biggest difference between these lenses is the VR - vibration reduction. This means you can shoot static subjects at slower shutter speeds and not be affected by hand shake as much. It's a real technical improvement and well worth the €20 difference in my opinion.

"ED" is to be seen as a marketing term in this context - ED glass is very important in high-performance telephotos and the like. In the case of these slow consumer zooms, you're not giving up any performance by forgoing it. In fact, the VR makes the slow max aperture less of a liability, making more photos possible.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I was thinking the same, but I wasn't sure. I was confused by the price (VR is cheaper), so I wanted to check to be sure. Thanks! \$\endgroup\$
    – Ivan
    Commented Sep 13, 2011 at 9:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ Are those the prices for a body with the lens? In the US right now, street price for the non-VR lens is around $110, and around $120 for the VR version. I don't think there is a current kit with the non-VR version.... \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Commented Sep 14, 2011 at 3:54

According to DPReview

Changes compared to the non-VR version

As with Canon's 18-55mm IS upgrade, there are rather more changes from the previous Nikon 18-55mm than at first meet the eye. The physical similarity between the lenses masks a multitude of differences; most notably the new lens has a more complex optical formula of 11 elements in 8 groups as compared to 7 elements in 5 groups, and interestingly the new lens loses the Extra-low Dispersion (ED) glass element of its predecessor. The use of ED elements allows superior correction of image aberrations in simpler lens constructions, and presumably Nikon consider the more complex design of the new lens renders their use superfluous.

Other changes include a modest increase in size, with about 3mm added to the diameter and 6mm to the length, and a 60g increase in weight. As seems to be the current fashion, the smooth black plastic of the old lens has been replaced by a new stippled matte black finish, which resembles magnesium alloy and matches the D60 body. Other differences include a larger rear lens element (20mm vs 15mm), an additional circular flare-cut diaphragm placed in front of the aperture assembly, and new 'Super-Integrated Coatings'. Overall this newcomer is clearly a completely different beast to the old lens, and as the old 18-55mm had an unusually high reputation for image quality (for a kit lens at least), we will be interested to see if the new version maintains this standard.


the optics are at least as good as before ... Nikon have taken what was already a good lens and made it even better; it can't be overstated how useful VR can be in expanding photographic possibilities when using a camera handheld.

Some people in the DPReview forums stated they felt the ED lens had better image quality.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.