This summer I'll be attempting to get to the top of Kilimanjaro. I'm bringing my Olympus E-30 and a couple of lenses. The instructions I've received mentions that you should check the height range with the manufacturers of any digital equipment you're bringing.

Kilimanjaro is 5895 meters tall (19341 ft).

How, if at all, will the height affect my digital camera?

  • \$\begingroup\$ With temperatures around 20 F/-7 C at the top, you might want to bring extra batteries too and keep them at body temperature between use to maximize the usage. \$\endgroup\$
    – user2559
    Commented Aug 27, 2012 at 23:55

3 Answers 3


Nothing will be wrong with your digital camera.

However, do not use a Microdrive or any device which includes ones. Those have a 10,000 ft maximum altitude. Microdrives as Compact Flash are rare these days but they are commonly (but not always) used in video cameras, iPods and media-players.

Once on a press trip with 11 other photographers we reached an altitude of 12,000 feet and every single iPod in the group failed. A number of people were expecting to use those devices to off-load their data. I was surprised to find out I was the only one who know about the altitude problem.

NOTE: It is actually not the altitude that matters but the air-pressure that is necessary to lift the HDD head off the platter. Still, manufacturers quote altitude. Where it matters is on a plane. Commercial aircraft are pressurized around 85kpa (as measured by me) which corresponds to a much lower altitude (roughly around 6000 ft) than their corresponding cruising altitude, so you can use a Microdrive on most such aircrafts.

  • \$\begingroup\$ I think that it is air density rather than the pressure that's important, but otherwise you are correct. \$\endgroup\$
    – ysap
    Commented Jul 2, 2011 at 0:49
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @ysap: pV=nRT for ideal gas. That means p~n/V and you both are right for such normal circumstances ;) \$\endgroup\$
    – Leonidas
    Commented Jul 2, 2011 at 4:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Leonidas - the key point is "normal circumstances". If temp and pressure drop, you still have same n for your given volume V (i.e, same density), and my intuition is that the drive can still work in these conditions. After all, L=0.5*rhov^2*SCl, and p is not a part of this equation. \$\endgroup\$
    – ysap
    Commented Jul 2, 2011 at 4:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ysap: If pressure drops, you have less n per V, that is the meaning of the reduced equation: T can be safely assumed quasi-constant here, because the operator/material gives out earlier (that is what I meant by 'normal'). In your equation p hides in ρ. \$\endgroup\$
    – Leonidas
    Commented Jul 2, 2011 at 15:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Leonidas - Not quite. If the pressure drops in a closed, constant volume V, then the only other parameter that can change is T. n is actually constant in this situation (no molecules out or in). The Ideal Gas Equation has more degrees of freedom than constraints, so unless you bound some of the variable, you have infinite possibilities to balance a change in one of them. Now, of course for the normal situation, T can be considered fairly constant, hence the relation between p and rho. However, I was pointing out the general case. Given the lift force equation, it is clear what is the ... \$\endgroup\$
    – ysap
    Commented Jul 2, 2011 at 15:39

I doubt that it will. I use a digital camera at 14,000+ feet fairly routinely (and only use it below 6000 feet or so when I travel). Aircraft have used cameras with little or no modification for quite a while, often at considerably higher altitudes than you're considering. Many are different because they're specialized, (e.g., shooting only in infrared or other narrow range of color), but quite a few use pretty standard parts too (e.g., the 105 Micro Nikkor lens has been used for a fair amount of aerial photography).

The only thing I can think of right off isn't the camera or the altitude themselves, but that at altitude the temperature is generally a lot lower, which can reduce the power you get from your batteries. If it's very cold, you're often better off with at least two batteries, so you can carry one in a pocket (or whatever) where it'll stay warm, and you can swap the two as needed.

Edit: one other thing I should mention: at higher altitudes, you also get quite a bit more UV light, so a good UV filter can be extremely useful, even if you don't normally use one at lower altitude.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Why the 105 Micro specifically for aerial? Just because its so sharp? \$\endgroup\$
    – rfusca
    Commented Jul 1, 2011 at 21:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ @rfusca: The sharpness is the reason I've heard, yes. I'd guess the focal length is basically a matter of plane speed vs. frames per second. You want the longest lens you can (to maximize detail) but still get enough coverage to put together a continuous map from the result. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 1, 2011 at 21:04
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Just being curious - what brings you regularly to 14K ft? \$\endgroup\$
    – ysap
    Commented Jul 2, 2011 at 0:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ysap: I live in Colorado and I enjoy hiking. In this case "regularly" doesn't mean 3 times a day or anything like that; one a month (on average) would probably be closer. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 2, 2011 at 4:17
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I find it amusing that a macro lens gets used for arial photography. :-P \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 2, 2011 at 6:41

The camera will be fine.

It's worth noting that some camera components have trouble at extreme altitudes.

In my case, the place I work flew a Canon 30D on a high-altitude balloon, which makes it up to ~90,000-100,000 feet.
Unfortunately, some idiot forgot to turn the flash off, and the flash self destructed due to lack of cooling (there is little air to dissipate heat through convection at that altitude).
However the camera itself was fine. The flash required a trip to Canon for replacement.

Basically, you camera will even work fine in a vacuum, if you turn the flash off.

It's worth noting that it's probably not a good idea to do sustained burst shooting in a vacuum, since again, there is no air to disipate heat, and it all has to radiate away. The above balloon project had the camera shooting every minute or two.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Add some radiators next time ;) \$\endgroup\$
    – Leonidas
    Commented Jul 2, 2011 at 15:21
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Ah! Some real-life physics, at last... Getting out of all these pixel mania... Very interesting anecdote. \$\endgroup\$
    – ysap
    Commented Jul 2, 2011 at 15:49
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Leonidas - I'm not sure where you would put a radiator on a flash. And besides, what would a radiator accomplish? There is effectively no air at the altitude this was working at. At that point, the only heat-transfer mode is through radiation, e.g. thermal photons. The only effective solution is to thermally couple hot things to things with large exposed surface areas to radiate the heat away, and then if it gets struck by the sun, you have a major problem. \$\endgroup\$
    – Fake Name
    Commented Jul 3, 2011 at 10:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Fake Name You'd attach them to the glas-bulb of course. Just kidding ;) What you describe is called radiators (too) - the ISS has some made of aluminium. You could either coat them on the sun-side or keep them in a shadow of something not conductive. \$\endgroup\$
    – Leonidas
    Commented Jul 3, 2011 at 14:06
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Fake Name - a radiator will accomplish one thing at high altitude: adding thermal capacity to the system. You're right that convection is negligible at >100k ft, but a large heat sink will still help by drawing heat from the device, so that the heating effect isn't localised. Of course, once the whole heat sink has risen to the device temperature, only the added surface area for radiating infra-red will make a difference, but it will buy your device more life before it overcooks. \$\endgroup\$
    – user17539
    Commented Mar 4, 2013 at 12:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.