0
\$\begingroup\$

enter image description here

I found a film from my wedding 12 yrs ago after having a clear out, I got it developed as was desperate to see what was on it as I only lost my husband a month ago... Some photos aren't too bad, ones taken outside, but most taken inside are quite bitty, can this be fixed in any way? They were developed and sent back on a CD so they are already digital. Please can someone help?

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ What do you mean by "bitty"? Do you mean grainy or noisy? Can you post some samples? Do you only have the CD? That is, no negatives? From your description of outdoor vs indoor results, I would guess that the indoor photos were probably vastly underexposed, and in order to produce any kind of image now, the scanner probably amplified the signal, also amplifying the noisy base - in which case, my assessment would be, there's probably very little you can do to improve them, certainly not without the negatives. \$\endgroup\$
    – osullic
    Feb 10 at 18:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes i do have the negatives... I cant seem to find where i can add a photo to show you. Its not grainy, just has loads of white dots all over it \$\endgroup\$ Feb 10 at 19:08
  • \$\begingroup\$ @smirnofffff if you edit your post (click the "Edit" link below the tags at the bottom of the post), you can upload an image using the editor tools. see: How to upload an image to a post? \$\endgroup\$
    – scottbb
    Feb 10 at 22:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thankyou. This is a perticullarly dar one, but then it means you can see the white spots all over it, I have lots more and although i know the pictures werent taken very well as they were disposable cameras, i was just hoping there was some way to make some of them a bit better \$\endgroup\$ Feb 11 at 20:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think its the lighting thats the problem, if they didnt give the flash time to recharge it wont have gone off, other photos are fine and the ones outside are fine too, so i think its deffo the flash, or lack of it :( Sorry for spelling in last post, didnt read it again before i posted it and must have fat typing fingers LOL \$\endgroup\$ Feb 11 at 20:40

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.