0
\$\begingroup\$

I'm considering few options to do macrophotography with tilt shift possibilities. I'll have a Canon R5C or R3 camera and either:

  • Canon EF 50 and 90 TSE with EF-R adapter and Novoflex R bellow without tilt shift movements

or

  • Novoflex tilt shift bellow with medium format lenses (eg., Fujifilm, Schneider Kreuznach), so I can have proper image circle

What would be significantly better in terms of possibilities (eg., with medium format lenses, I have more many lenses, even zoom, with the Canon TS-E, I can rotate both tilt and shift, but not with the tilt shift bellow) and image quality (say I'm using 50 Mpixels) ?

I would like to optimize image quality and tilt and shift and macro possibilities (magnitude).

A drawback with the medium format would be the price, depending on the optics.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Any Canon TS-E lens will project a significantly larger image circle than a standard EF lens. They have to in order to allow for the shift movements of the TS-E lens. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented Oct 25, 2022 at 23:21

2 Answers 2

2
\$\begingroup\$

A tilt shift lens like the Canon TSE and a medium format lens on a tilt shift bellows both provide oversized image circles to allow shifting the lens/circle... so I do not see an advantage to the medium format lenses in the sense of "a proper image circle."

FWIW, I have both. I have the older Novaflex TS bellows (square, only the front standard moves), and I have Nikon PC-E lenses. Due to the small format of DSLR's, I find the tilt function of both to be quite difficult to use with any accuracy; even when tethered to a laptop it is difficult (but that does help a lot). And that's only for general use/closeup use (small-ish product shots)... I haven't even attempted macro where accurate use of TS would be that much more difficult. IMO, you would be better off using the R3's built in focus stacking 99% of the time.

IMO, the main advantage of the bellows is that it allows a large variety of lens options and magnification ratios for macro and high magnification macro (reversed lens), which is how I use it. For critical alignment I use a geared head, not the tilt lens/bellows function.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

Large format film cameras probably provide the best option for macro photography because:

  • The maximum magnification is only dependent on bellows extension.

  • Any focal length lens can be used.

  • The image circle becomes larger as the magnification increases.

  • The longer focal lengths make for larger absolute tilt movements because the film plane and lens plane are further apart, and the greater absolute tilt movement allows for finer adjustments.

  • The longer focal lengths allow for greater working distances.

  • Large format film provides unparalleled resolution.

  • Focusing with the rear standard allows the lens to subject distance to remain constant.

Of course there’s no such thing as a free lunch.

But large format film is also easy to reason about, and allows for multiple exposure lighting.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.