enter image description here

(crop showing effected area) enter image description here

Can anybody tell me what has happened to my sensor here? I can vaguely see this pattern on the sensor when I open the shutter and look at the sensor, but it doesn't look how a scratch would form normally.

The example image is taken with a 50 mm lens on a Canon 5D Mk I using:

  • ISO 100
  • f/20
  • 1/10 sec

Edit: not sure of the etiquette here, but just wanted to thank everyone for the responses. I realise my original post wasn't very clear (using a blurry photo) so apologies for that Phillip.

For those interested there are a few more photos below, 1 of the sensor and another 3 of a blank wall at f/5, f/10, f/22 with the 50mm.

I tend to use this camera with the lens wide open anyway and it is very old so I do not have much desire/need to go out to fix. The visibility of the 'pattern' drops off quickly below f/5.

enter image description here

enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here

  • \$\begingroup\$ What shutter speed, aperture and ISO was this taken at, does this occur with multiple lenses and was image stabilisation in use? \$\endgroup\$
    – Philip Kendall
    Commented May 3, 2022 at 12:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hi, thanks for getting back! Seems to be more visible at higher apertures (above f/3 ish) - no other settings seems to have an impact. It's definitely coming from the sensor - its just about visible looking at the sensor if the light catches it right. I presume a scratch, just the pattern of it looks almost more like a set of cracks! \$\endgroup\$
    – Joe
    Commented May 3, 2022 at 13:04
  • 9
    \$\begingroup\$ Hi Philip, I'm not claiming it to be anything like a good photo - it was just a good example for the issue I have (mainly due to aperture f/20). \$\endgroup\$
    – Joe
    Commented May 3, 2022 at 13:35
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Philip, what if these exposure settings were exactly what the photographer intended? What if they weren't trying to follow your "rule of thumb?" \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 3, 2022 at 20:56
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ At this point I'd try taking a photo without a lens, looking directly at a grey card or something plain and neutral. That way the only focal plane is the sensor and anything in focus must be at the sensor \$\endgroup\$
    – Chris H
    Commented May 4, 2022 at 9:46

4 Answers 4


Looks like fungus on the sensor (possibly under the low-pas filter). Some examples:


This is too long to post as a comment:

In a past life I've looked at many silicon wafers under a microscope with various stacks of deposited thin films and while I can't say so definitively, the appearance is certainly consistent with cracking and local delamination of a previously continuous thin film from the surface where it was deposited/grown, due to residual stress.

These often break the films into islands with sizes of tens of microns to millimeters.

Sometimes it happens spontaneously, sometimes it happens after differential thermal expansion between the film and the underlying material increases the stress beyond what the film can maintain. If a batch of sensors or the IR filters were slightly misprocessed the strength of the film could be reduced or the stress elevated, or this could have been from the edge of a wafer where it is generally harder to keep all aspects of processing in spec.

If you arranged to make several images like this at different f/no with the appropriate change in exposure time to keep the brightness about the same, you could then plot some measure of "fuzziness" against f/no and get some idea (using math and hand-waving) how far away these cracks are from the sensor silicon itself, and therefore where this might be happening in the stack of optical materials between the top of the sensor and the silicon.

I don't know if they do it for cameras, but theoretically the sensor package will have stamped on it somewhere a "lot ID" or "batch number" that could in principle be used by the manufacturer to identify if there was a cluster of failures from a certain group of sensors or filters or packages. They could in principle issue a recall or free replacement. This happens in automobile manufacturing and occasionally from time-to-time in high-end chip manufacturing, but I don't know if camera manufacturers ever do this.

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I had a Sony camera that had a sensor replaced via a recall, so it has happened at least once. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 5, 2022 at 13:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ @MarkRansom oh that's good to know, thank you! \$\endgroup\$
    – uhoh
    Commented May 5, 2022 at 13:54

It looks like the two main hypotheses are:

Either seems possible, and with the given info (including the updated photos), neither can definitively be ruled out. It could even be something else entirely, like scratches or cloth fibers.

If the problem is fungus, it is possible to have cleaned. I'm assuming you've already tried basic sensor cleaning, so disassembly would be required.

If they are cracks, some glass, like the IR blocking hot mirror, can be removed or replaced. So this could be an opportunity to get into IR photography. You can also use the lens with wider apertures where the defect is less noticeable.

For future reference:

  • To photograph shadows produced by sensor-level defects, use a plain background, like clear sky, with narrow aperture.

  • If you have a 50mm prime, you can use it as a loupe to get a closer look at the sensor. (Look through the lens reversed.)

  • If you have another camera and macro lens capable of 1:1 or greater magnification, you can try photographing the sensor directly.


The photo showing the sensor makes it obvious to me. It looks like cracks, not fungus or scratches.

The "squiggly lines" are clearly visible, and they are partly darker and partly brighter than the greenish background, with one preferred line direction appearing brighter than the others. This very much looks like reflections of some light source, caused by cracks in glass.

With fungus, I'd expect the lines to have a more consistent color.

I'd also exclude scratches, as scratches tend to have a more regular pattern.

I don't know if it's possible to replace or remove the cracked glass layer.

If you can remove the layer, be aware that this might influence the focussing characteristics:

  • As you are replacing some (flat) glass element with air, you shorten the effective flange distance a bit, meaning that you have to adjust the lens distance settings a bit to the shorter-range direction (e.g. setting to 30m for an infinity object).
  • As this change only applies to the image sensor, and not to the AF sensor (1) or the viewfinder, your photos will probably become out-of-focus.

(1) I wasn't able to find a schematics drawing of the 5D Mark I, but from drawings of other, older Canons I assume it uses a distinct AF sensor, not a focussing system integrated into the image sensor.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The dark lines look like shadows of the bright ones in the 3rd photo (the greenish area). Same shape, slightly above and to the left. No idea what they are. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 5, 2022 at 23:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ @user2554330 Yes. It really looks like shadows of the bright lines. Scene seems to be illuminated from bottom-right, in a rather flat angle. Although we now have a new interpretation of the dark lines, I still think the bright ones are cracks, reflecting the bottom-right light source. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 6, 2022 at 7:39
  • \$\begingroup\$ Again, thanks for the responses. The darker lines on the sensor image are definitely shadows cast on a 'lower layer' of the sensor from the 'cracks' above. \$\endgroup\$
    – Joe
    Commented May 6, 2022 at 9:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ Cracks from age/general fatigue is my working theory currently. Its a very old second hand camera, no idea of the shutter count. It makes a hell of a thwack when you take a photo - like a gun recoiling!! \$\endgroup\$
    – Joe
    Commented May 6, 2022 at 9:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.