- I am not a professional photographer, so I ask for your indulgence in that some basics may not be obvious to me.
- I am in the early stages of planning a scientific study on a moose (Alces alces) population.
- One of the goals is to develop mathematical models of their scat.
- In order to fit various mathematical models, I want 3D mesh data.
- In order to obtain 3D mesh data of moose scat, I want to reconstruct them from images.
- In order to reconstruct 3d meshes from images, I would like consistent images of each piece of scat from multiple angles.
- Three of the more specific properties I want to be consistent are the lighting, colour balance, and resolution.
- In order to reconstruct a closed mesh as an estimate of a scat pellet's surface, I need to photograph the whole surface.
- While many scat pellets are convex, or even close to an ellipsoid in the nicer cases, we cannot rely on the scat being convex in all cases.
- I own a rebel t3i DSLR.
- I own a tripod.
I am thinking that I need some lights to keep the light intensity and colour consistent, although I do not know what else I should require for spectral properties. I have also thought that some sort of rotating platform with marked angles might help me take consistent images of most of a pellet's surface, but I have not worked out how to position the pellet without changing it when the pellet may not balance nicely.
I have read that it is desirable to have as low of an ISO as possible, which is a level of sensor sensitivity that can pick up less intense light but at the price of more noise. This is because the noise can create artifacts in the 3D reconstruction. So I think I need a brightly-lit setup so that I can set the ISO as low as I can (ISO ~100).
So my two problems seem to be:
- reliable lighting
- reliable positioning
How do I overcome these photography challenges so I can move onto doing some poopy math and science?