I've just started scanning my families negatives. When I get the scan, it's a bit brighter than the print that was made that I can compare it to, but the print has less details in the dark areas.

Alas, if I bring down the exposure in post, I get an image more in line with the print, but instead those before mentioned shadows swallow some detail. Is there a right way do do it. Which is the "true" image?

  • "True image" is very abstract. You can create two or three scans and then combine them in HDR. Jun 9, 2021 at 16:56

2 Answers 2


I would say that "true image" is a fallacy. There is no true image. Match your scans to your prints if you want. I wouldn't. That's the point of scanning negatives – to draw out as much of the image as possible – more than the original print may show. Edit it however you want it to appear. Photo editing is intrinsically a subjective process.

I use Adobe Photoshop. If you do too, look into the "Curves" tool. I use it to adjust input/output highlights/shadows independently, and if desired you can operate on RGB channels independently. Any other good image editing software will offer the same feature (maybe under a different label).

Couple of links on the Curves tool:


Once you have a scan that contains detail in all parts of the dynamic range, you can tweak it in post processing. Lowering overall exposure is only one option. You can brighten or darken the dark and bright regions separately.

How to do this exactly would depend on your software.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.