I've been using a cheap basic tripod for several difference scenarios recently, specifically panoramas, night time shots, and HDRs. I'm thinking of upgrading to a better tripod (this one is rather heavy and clunky), and it was suggested that a monopod might be better. I don't tend to take much with me other than my camera, so the smaller/lighter, the better. I know that a monopod isn't going to give me quite as much stability as a tripod, but what advantages does it have instead? And can anyone recommend a good quality budget one? Thanks!
- access to places that don't allow it
- weight (when hiking)
- in wildlife photography and other similar feats, a monopod is often good enough for long lenses
- in sports, racing, birding, it can be easier to follow the action
- utility (as a walking stick)
- takes the weight off of big lenses (especially when the shutter speed needed is sufficiently fast for hand-holding)
- sports (especially when trying to get a low angle for a good perspective and background)
- stick a flash on it and get off camera flash look without much setup
- get higher angles if you have a remote shutter/use self timer
It can also be very stable if you use it correctly.
Tripods are banned where you want to take pictures.
You need some stability but increased mobility from a tripod (concerts or some sports shooting for example).
You need something lighter to carry and don't intend on taking really long exposures.
Why? It can sometime help you overcome this kind of troubles.
Do you really want to risk blurry shots from those once-in-a-lifetime photo opportunities? Of course not! You've already chosen the best travel camera for your trips, but the best tripod may not be suited for your next trip. So you need a specially designed travel tripod that's small enough to pack and tough enough to keep your camera steady for night shots, selfies and amazing interiors.