1

In my folders I store images as raw and as jpg as I'm not comfortable with a pure raw photography workflow yet. I regularly group the files by filename when applying operations such as rating or face tagging, which works pretty well.

The only thing which does not work well is having a slideshow (full screen view) for the JPEG's only.

How can I avoid seeing raw + jpg in the slideshow and only get the JPEG's?

2
  • Probably the easiest way is to not have both images in the same directory - I separate my raws from my jpegs in two different directory hierarchies, which are identical, except for a different parent directory (i.e. they're organized the same, but in different places). That way, I point digikam at the jpeg hierarchy, and darktable/rawtherapee at the raw hierarchy... – twalberg Mar 10 at 17:26
  • @twalberg yeah, I'm starting to thinking about such a change or some general improvement of my workflow. I still have to learn a lot. – BayerSe Mar 11 at 6:38
0

There's a bit of an "X-Y problem" in the headline question - as far as I know it's a bit of a pain to exclude a certain type of image.

Fortunately, it's very easy to set up a slideshow with only the pictures you want to see, particularly when this is a type of file (for example only .jpg).

Change the display to the "Table" format (assuming it wasn't on that already - Digikam usually defaults to thumbnails). Click at the top of the column to sort by "Type". Click on the first .jpg, then shift-click on the last to block select.

[If you want to get fancy, CTRL-click lets you select and deselect any files you want - this approach also works from the thumbnail display, and could be used after "Select all" to exclude specific files if you really wanted to do it that way.]

At the right of the "Slideshow" tab there should be a drop-down menu. Check this is on "Selection" (and not "All").

Press the "Slideshow" button (or ALT-F9) to run the slideshow of the selected files.

1
  • Thanks. This works but I'd hoped for something easier with less clicks. Sounds like there is room for some improvement, either on my end (separate raw+jpg?) or on the digiKam side. – BayerSe Mar 11 at 6:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.