I'm getting very poor focus particularly at the long end of an 80-320mm tele lens that I am using with my Pentax K10D.

The lens was originally bought for my 35mm Pentax SLR (maybe an MZ5 or something, I don't remember, and it's at teh back of a cupboard these days), and worked very well with the film camera.

Theoretically the lens is compatible with the K10D, though obviously the different sensor sizes mean that it's not a direct 80-320mm equivalent.

The problem has been present since I first bought the camera about 15(?) years ago, but I encountered it a couple of nights ago again and the frustration led me to post this question in case there is a solution.

The photo below shows the issue.

Out of focus image

The image was shot at the '320mm' end of the tele lens and the settings are shown below.

Image information

The image is absolutely pin sharp in the veiw finder, but as you can see the resulting photo is blurred. Not only that, but the 'in-focus' beep and dot are on when the image appears to be in focus.

A while after gettng the camera I swapped the focus plate for a 'Katz Eye Optics' split prism partly to see if this led to any improvement and partly because I always loved this type of focus on my dad's old Pentax film cameras. Sadly it made no difference so it seems that the problem was not that the image was out of focus in the VF.

I've read about the AF issues on the K10D, but this is when manually focussing and also when ignoring the 'in-focus' beep (I tried ignoring the beep years ago when I first saw the issue - long before I read about the K10D AF issue).

I haven't seen the problem with the 28-80mm lens supplied with the K10D, but I have assumed that that is because it has a max focal length of 80mm and the problem only seems to manifest at the long end of the tele lens.

Is this problem likely to be lens incompatability, an issue that is only noticeable when shooting subjects like this at a distance, or something inherantly wrong in the body (like the AF / back focus issue)?

Edit: I forgot to mention that I also had a Circular Polarizer fitted for this shot as the moon was very very bright that night, but the same blur occurs without when shooting other subjects.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Are you using a tripod? And a remote shutter release or a self timer in the camera? The most likely problem is user error (nothing personal). Misalignment in the camera's optical system is also possible, but it is less likely. Also remove the polarizer so it can be eliminated from the equation. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 3, 2021 at 23:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes, sorry, forgot to mention that as well - tripod mounted and remote shutter release. The shot posted is with the CP filter, but I shot others without and they are also blurred. Ki posted the CP shot as the blur is more obvious as there is less glare). \$\endgroup\$
    – Fat Monk
    Mar 3, 2021 at 23:22
  • \$\begingroup\$ Also possible that the camera is just worn out. The popular forum for Pentax cameras suggests mirror failure in the K10d can be an issue. That would explain the focus problems in both manual and auto modes. It's an old camera. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 3, 2021 at 23:38
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @MichaelC thanks for the links. I haven't read them all, but that first one seems spot on with my fears - limits of the lens is, at least, better than a faulty camera body. I still have the same problem without filters, so that's not the issue, but seeing the problem at the long end of an 80-320mm film camera lens fits the description of the most likely cause in that first linked post. I'll keep experimenting to try to confirm. \$\endgroup\$
    – Fat Monk
    Mar 4, 2021 at 9:00

1 Answer 1


The following is all guesswork, and should be a comment on the question rather than an answer, if it weren't so long.

First off, motion blur could be the reason, but the uniform dizziness around the moon's border suggests to me that it's not the case here.

I do see a little bit of chromatic aberration on the right side of the moon. Are we looking at the full picture here? If the moon was in a corner section of the image, it could suggest that this is normal for an old, cheap lens of this type (although, this is a full-format lens on an APS-C sensor, so it's not that far outside of the center either way).

It could be that the mirror or sensor system is somehow out of alignment, as that would cause the image to be sharp in the view finder but out of focus on the sensor plane. I've had this happen to my K3.

To verify if that's the case, use the camera's Live View and have it focus. Use the widest aperture possible in order to get a small depth of focus. Note the position of the focus ring. Then switch back out of Live View and have it focus again. Compare the results. If you consistently get a different focus positions, or if view finder is out of focus if Live View was in focus, and vice versa, then there's an alignment issue (which is probably not fixable other than using the Camera menu to adjust the AF offset, although that won't fix the issue that the view finder will show the image slightly out of focus then).

If the focus positions are the same, then it's rather likely that your lens is bad, such as having gotten the dreaded lens fungus.

As to the question why it's only visible with the tele lens: I guess it's the smaller depth of focus you get with the long focal length. It could, however, also simply be that the lens is not sharp at the end ranges. I remember having had cheap lenses in the 80s that would be like that, and even today's lenses still suffer from that in the corners, especially the zoom ones. Although that effect is more likely to happen in shorter focal ranges.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks, some intersting thoughts there. Unfortunately the K10D doesn't have Live View (I wished I'd waited 6-12 months after bying as LV was much more common then). I suspect you may be right about limits of the lens, unfortunately. I also took some shots at 1/4000 so motion blur shouldn't be an issue. I'll have a bit more of a play and see what I can work out. (I've also updated the question as I forgot to mention I had a CP filter on as well as the moon was very very bright that night). \$\endgroup\$
    – Fat Monk
    Mar 3, 2021 at 12:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ What kind of CP filter were you using? Have you tried comparing shots taken with it and without it in less challenging focus scenarios to see if it could be affecting IQ? We've got an old question here somewhere that demonstrates the effect of a less than adequate filter on telephoto shots, but I can't find it. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Mar 4, 2021 at 1:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ @MichaelC I have the same issue without the CP (without any filter) but I posted the CP one as the blur is easier to see without the glare. \$\endgroup\$
    – Fat Monk
    Mar 4, 2021 at 10:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ The CP filter has one of two effects: If you don't adjust exposure when you add the CP it reduces exposure, thus reducing any "blur" due to overexposure, if you do adjust exposure, then your exposure time will increase by around one stop, so blur from the motion of the moon would be increased. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Mar 5, 2021 at 2:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ @MichaelC The camera was on full manual. I added the CP filter to reduce any over exposure (the moon was too bright) and to remove any scattered light from the atmosphere - is the filter seemed like a good thing to add. As the shutter speed was fixed at 1/1000 for the shot there would be no motion blur. Yes I could have opened the aperture and increased the shutter speed to 1/4000 but as I understand it a wider aperture is more likely to produce a blurred shot (assuming shutter speed is fast enough which 1/1000 should be for the moon at this magnification). \$\endgroup\$
    – Fat Monk
    Mar 5, 2021 at 8:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.