My question is how to avoid banding in images made under LED lights using a full electronic shutter.

I am using a Sony AIII and Sony A9 cameras. When I photograph with the A7III using silent shutter (full electronic shutter) under LED lights, I often get soft-edged bands of lighter and darker exposure across the image. Why does this occur and how can I avoid it? I don't seem to get this problem (at least not to a degree that I have noticed it) with the A9.

I understand that if I use mechanical shutter at a speed under 1/60 second (1/50 in 50hz countries), I will avoid the problem because the shutter will be open for a full cycle of the LED light emittance. Why does the problem occur with full electronic shutter? And why does the A9 avoid it? I understand that the A9 sensor can do a full electronic scan and readout more quickly than the A7III or many other cameras. But I would think that would make the LED banding problem worse rather than better. But the A9 is much better about not banding when using full electronic shutter under LED lights.

How does all of this happen?

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Could you please add an example photo which shows the effect, along with the settings (exposure time, aperture, ISO) used for that photo? Thanks! \$\endgroup\$
    – Philip Kendall
    Nov 5, 2020 at 14:56
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ It seems like you already have an idea of what is going on. (LED flickers. Electronic shutter scans. Different parts of image have varying light intensity.) Specifically what part are you having difficulty with? \$\endgroup\$
    – xiota
    Nov 5, 2020 at 16:44

2 Answers 2


Way back in 2014 Canon introduced a feature with the 7D Mark II that they called flicker reduction. Basically, the camera uses the light meter to detect the timing of flickering lights and then times the shutter release so that the middle of the exposure coincides with the peak of flickering lights. Remember, with focal plane shutters the time difference between the movement of the first and second shutter curtains is what establishes exposure time. The shutter curtains always move across the frame at the same speed. The total transit time of each shutter curtain is always the same for a given camera, regardless of the selected "shutter speed". Thus, for any given camera, opening the first curtain x/2 milliseconds before the light peaks, where x is the shutter curtain transit time in milliseconds, insures that the peak of the light occurs at the halfway point in the total transit time of the first curtain. With most AC powered lights this results in a fairly evenly exposed frame because the cycle of the light's flicker is sinusoidal, which means the intensity changes less per time unit at the top and bottom of the cycle than it changes at the mid-point in the cycle.

This was primarily intended to help sports shooters working under flickering artificial lighting use shorter exposure times without suffering the effects of the flickering lights when the exposure occurs at the mid-point or low-point of the flickering light cycle. It has proved to work very well. Personally, I never intended to buy another APS-C camera until the introduction of the 7D Mark II with the feature. When shooting field sports at night with a 70-200mm f/2.8 lens I went from getting about two or three out of every ten frames with good, balanced light and color from one side of the frame to the other when shooting at around 1/800-1/1000 seconds with the 7D to getting between nine and ten good frames (in terms of brightness and color, LOL) out of a ten shot burst when using the 7D Mark II with the flicker reduction turned on.

Canon has included the feature on most of their higher than entry level cameras since that time, and even include it on some entry level DSLRs and all mirrorless cameras as of 2020. It has been very well received.

The Sony α9, introduced in 2017, uses a similar scheme to time the shutter release, whether mechanical or electronic, with the detected peak of the light in the scene. Just as the transit time of a shutter curtain remains constant in most modern cameras with focal plane shutters, the scanning time of a sensor using electronic shutter also remains constant over various exposure times. It's the difference between "on" and "off" for each line that determines the exposure time. That's probably why you're not seeing it near as much or at all with the α9 as with the α7 III. Since the α7 III was not intended to primarily be a "sports" type camera like the α9, and since it has a much slower readout sensor, it probably does not include the feature.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for the very interesting and helpful explanation! The new Sony A7C does not have a first curtain mechanical shutter. The first curtain is always electronic. It can take an image either with full electronic curtains (silent) or with the first curtain being EFCS and the second curtain being mechanical. To what extent would the hybrid shutter reduce the uneven exposure problem and would the anti-flicker setting (which the A7C does have) help? Thanks again. \$\endgroup\$
    – chiron
    Nov 6, 2020 at 17:08
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ if we can see multiple bands of light, like @chiron says, then the shutter "movement" is obviously too slow to capture the whole scene during the single "peak of light" so no amount of "flicker reduction" trickery can help. this is the unfortunate performance limitation of all electronic shutters, except rare cases, like a9, where the electronic shutter (1/150s) is only slightly slower than mechanical (1/250s). electronic shutter in most cameras is several times slower than mechanical and they are useless for flickering light, for example a7III is 1/16s or 1/28s depending on the mode. \$\endgroup\$
    – szulat
    Nov 6, 2020 at 23:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ Even the difference between about 6.7 milliseconds (1/150) that the α9 is capable of and the mechanical curtain transit time of about 2.5ms (1/400) that the 1D X Mark II and III and 7D Mark II can do are noticeable if you're looking for it. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Nov 7, 2020 at 4:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ @chiron Does the α7C have a flicker reduction feature for still images or for shooting video? Many cameras have video flicker reduction (which is generally a bias towards longer exposure times to deal with 50/60Hz flicker). \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Nov 7, 2020 at 18:03

The problem is, that the camera does not do a full sensor readout in one go (or global shutter), but reads the sensor linewise.

LED light is often pulsing to dim the light. So when you see a LED that is half bright, it often is instead flickering faster than your eye can detect and is instead off for half of the time.

If you combine both, you get something like this:

0000000000000000000000000000000 <- Pixel row
1111111111111111111111111111111        |
1111111111111111111111111111111       time
0000000000000000000000000000000        |
0000000000000000000000000000000        V

where 0 is a time where the LED is off, and 1 is a time where the LED is on.

There is not much you can do. If you are lucky, you can change the shutterspeed so that the banding does not become visible, but most of the time the only way to circumvent flickering LED light is by using the mechanical shutter.

If you can change the LED illumination, use quality video or photography LED lights. They use better dimming circuits that drive the LEDs fast enough, that the problem is not visible.

The flicker reduction in the Sony cameras does not help, as that is meant to counter issues with light flickering with the frequency of the AC/DC currents, not for the faster LED modulation.

If the cameras evolve enough to read-out all pixels at the same time, then mechanical shutter would be obsolete.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for the good explanation. Wouldn't a global shutter be unable to cope also since all of its exposure might occur during an "off" period of the flickering LED? \$\endgroup\$
    – chiron
    Nov 6, 2020 at 17:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ Also, I would like to ask you about the the new Sony A7C and this problem. It does not have a first curtain mechanical shutter. The first curtain is always electronic. It can take an image either with full electronic curtains (silent) or with the first curtain being EFCS and the second curtain being mechanical. To what extent would the hybrid shutter reduce the uneven exposure problem and would the anti-flicker setting (which the A7C does have) help? Thanks again. \$\endgroup\$
    – chiron
    Nov 6, 2020 at 17:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ @chiron yes, but you would get no banding. And the flicker detection could try to squeeze the shot between the flickers. And you would solve the problem of rolling shutter effect. Plus you could use strobe flashes with a electronic global shutter. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 7, 2020 at 22:19
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @chiron I have not used this camera, but was surprised. I just read into he manual and it seems you are right. The settings seem only default or silent shutter. You cannot use flash in full silent shutter. And I am pretty sure you cannot use the HSS feature of some flash systems at all with elect. first curtain, because you get banding too. (I have owned a a7III and a a7rIV - as mainly use strobes, I am on full mechanical all the time) \$\endgroup\$ Nov 7, 2020 at 22:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.