1

I don't exactly know how to describe the problem. I have two maps that partly show the same extent of a place, but on the whole, the scale, rotation and protection might be different. I still want to put both pictures above each other so that I have both matching parts covered.

So far, I have been loading both images in Photoshop, turn on transparency for the covering layer and transform and rotate from all sides until the picture matches. The images that I am working with are quite large and my current solution is very slowly. I was wondering, whether there is a more elegant solution, similar to georeferencing?

Like I click on one location of a place in one picture that is also clearly obvious in the other, then click on the other picture to determine "this location on this picture is on that location on the other picture) and after defining a couple of such locations, the program distorts, stretches and whatnot the layer picture to make it fit.

I am just looking for a solution like this for Photoshop or any other program. Real-life coordinates are not important here!

Thanks a lot for your suggestions!

| improve this question | |
  • Perhaps the question should read: How to transpose one picture with reference points onto another picture? Transform or transpose ? "the scale, rotation and protection might be different." Hmmm. If they are not to the same scale, perspective and size then - - - not sure it is possible to make them match if that is the goal ? More details about what the end goal is may help. – Alaska Man May 18 at 21:34
  • Then transpose is the better word, obviously. I am aware that the transposed picture will be distorted at some point, that doesn't matter. I just need to find a georeferencing-kind-of-way for normal pictures to make the identical parts match each other. – Kai May 18 at 21:38
  • One way is to locate one point on both charts and move one over the other. Then locate another pair of matching points, and use a combined rotate/scale tool to make these other points coincide, using the first pair of points as the center of rotation and scale. But in the general case, charts won' necessarily match it, it will depend on the projection they use (even for quite local maps). – xenoid May 19 at 7:39
  • For the general case, you can perhaps use panorama application (Hugin or else), they have tools to distort images to make manually set reference points correspond. – xenoid May 19 at 7:41
  • 1
    I’m voting to close this question because it's not about photography. See photo.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic – osullic Jun 30 at 16:55
0

I'm not sure about the scale difference. I've never tried that. But Photoshop's PhotoMerge feature, which is used to create panoramic images from multiple smaller images is designed to do the rest of what you want to do.

If it can handle the different scale, all you would need to do is load the two images, then call up the function from File>Automation>PhotoMerge (menus may vary by version). It will give you a number of options to choose from and you may need to try different ones to see which works best for your specific images.

When you run the function, it will create a new image, using your two originals as layers in the new one, and matching and aligning them as much as it can, then masking out the layers to reveal one composite image. In doing so, it will twist and turn the images in the way you describe in order to make the major features of the images align.

You then have the option of doing whatever you want with those layers. Clear the masks and you will have two complete images. One or both may have been altered to suit, but they will align with each other, which seems to be your goal.

That is, IF it can handle the size difference.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    That is unfortunately not going to work because the maps are in a totally different style. The Photomerge would require that they look more or less the same, but my maps look entirely diffferent, except that they show the same location (respectively parts of it). – Kai May 18 at 22:08
  • 1
    We're probably going to need to see examples, if they're so wildly different. – Tetsujin May 19 at 5:36
0

It's funny you mention georeferencing. This is something all GIS programs can do quite easily (changing projections, mapping based on points, etc.).

If you don't necessarily have to use Photoshop, you could try using ArcMap (paid) or QGIS (free) to do this.

Edit: I just read you actually said you don't need to use Photoshop. So I'd definitely recommend using a GIS program. They will allow you to mark places on two seperate images, and then the program will fix the projection so the selected points match up exactly.

I vaguely remember using a really nice method years ago, but this link should get you started: https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/manage-data/editing-existing-features/choosing-a-rubbersheet-method.htm

| improve this answer | |
  • I know how to do it with ArcMap and QGIS, so that is not the problem. I wanted to know if there is a "relative" way, without using actual coordinates. I do have a vector layer in GIS that defines several areas over a city. Then I have some other maps of the same city that show different information. I then want to crop an image for every one of those areas from each map, but without losing quality. That's why I have a screenshot of the general map with the areas and use that as an overlay over my individual maps and then crop it. But the individual maps use different projections. – Kai Jun 2 at 12:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.