Ive taken some photographs using a DSLR on a tripod that i moved from left to right to create source files for a panorama. The image files from the DLSR are raw.

Ive opened them in photoshop camera raw, selected them all and clicked "merge to panorama".

This for the most part works, but i get some banding on the transitions between the various photos due to varying light conditions. See image attached. Is there anyway i can rectify this is post production ?

screenshot of panorama tool in photoshop showing the banding issue

The panorama in the above photo is made up of 21 individual files (i took more than i needed as i thought it might make for a better result).

I am not able to take the photos again, but if i could, for future knowledge, is there anything i should do different ?

Im running PS 2020 on MacOS 10.14

  • \$\begingroup\$ What camera mode were you shooting in? \$\endgroup\$ Jan 24, 2020 at 18:39
  • \$\begingroup\$ @LightBender i was in auto as i didnt have much time, and with the mixed lights in the scene it was pretty tricky. I dont shoot in DSLR often, i have basic knowledge of F stops, ISO, shutter speed, but dont practice it often so not very quick at setup etc.. \$\endgroup\$
    – sam
    Jan 24, 2020 at 18:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ related: What are the best techniques to take 360° panoramas? \$\endgroup\$
    – inkista
    Jan 25, 2020 at 20:42

2 Answers 2


The banding is caused by differences in exposure across frames. You have several options to address the problem.

  • Use the same exposure settings for every image. Manually set aperture, ISO, and shutter speed.

    If there is a huge variation of brightness levels across the scene, you can take bracketed exposures and process as HDR prior to stitching, as long as the exposure and processing is the same for every frame.

  • Edit the images prior to stitching to match images to each other. This is probably the "easiest" to do with your current images, but it is time consuming.

  • Use a program that can automatically correct for small differences between frames. Hugin uses one called enblend. The major hurdle is learning to use a different program. It's not as automated as Photoshop. (This is what I would do.)

  • Edit images after stitching. Older versions of Photoshop were able to put images on separate layers after processing for stitching. I don't know if current versions have retained the ability. This feature was useful for correcting parallax errors.

I use auto exposure on my camera if the dynamic range of the scene is within Hugin's ability to correct it automatically. If dynamic range is greater than Hugin can handle, I attempt to adjust the composition. If that doesn't fix the problem, I don't bother taking the photos because it will be time consuming to process with results that are likely to be poor.

Based on what I can see from your sample image, it does appear to be salvageable. I would use Hugin, but you may be more comfortable manually editing the images in Photoshop so that the seams will match more closely. With so many images, it will be time consuming. You can reduce the work by removing unnecessary images and images that obviously don't match the others. You can try using gradient masks to change the brightness across an image to match different exposures in adjacent images.

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Photoshop can do this 'outside' of cameraRAW, so it is possible to do the balancing first, then the merge/panorama separately - File > Automate > Photomerge \$\endgroup\$
    – Tetsujin
    Jan 24, 2020 at 19:42
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Tetsujin That is what I was referring to in my second point (edit prior to stitching). It's been years since I used Photoshop, so don't know the menu locations anymore. (Last version I used was the first version they added stitching.) \$\endgroup\$
    – xiota
    Jan 24, 2020 at 20:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ Also it is noteworthy, that vignette correction for the shots should be done. \$\endgroup\$ Jan 24, 2020 at 20:57
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @KaiMattern I don't see any obvious vignetting in the sample image. Usually vignetting is not an issue when stitching because the aperture is stopped down to increase DOF. Vignetting is worst when fast lenses are used wide open. \$\endgroup\$
    – xiota
    Jan 24, 2020 at 21:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ @xiota True, I was thinking in a more general way, but you are right with the objection that Panoramas are seldom shot wide open. \$\endgroup\$ Jan 24, 2020 at 21:54

You should avoid having photoshop do anything automatically if you can. As long as you have a good monitor and good eyes, everything you do by eye will be far better than what software can do. Turn off all image correction in your camera and do levels, contrast, and saturation by eye.

Use the fewest pics you can use to make it look good as far as perspective and whatever else is going on in the pics. Make the panaroma. Ignore the exposure differences and line up the pics to look good.

The basic idea is to cut pictures in half or more sections. change the lightness to match the next pic, and use soft edges to blend the pic together. Below I took an example section like it was one pic, made two copies - one for right edge, one for left, matched the left pic's lightness to the adjacent pic, took a giant eraser with 0% sharpness and erased the right side of the pic. Below is example.

You'll see that doing it this way means you'll probably only need a few pics. If the exposure really changes, you can add extra pics for exposure. You know, cut a pic into as many exposure slices as needed.

Your original example:

enter image description here

This is the section of your example I'm treating like one pic. Make two copies of it, one to match the right one to match the left

enter image description here

Here is that pic with the lightness on the right edge changed to match the next pic to the right. You see how the left edge has gotten way too light:

enter image description here

Then do the same with the left edge pic. Match it to the left edge and then do a super soft edge so it blends. I just swipe with a giant 0% hardness eraser but you can use marquee with feather to do it precisely

enter image description here

Make another copy of the pic with the right edge's lightness changed to match its neighbor to the right

enter image description here

Then put the half cut left edge layer over the right edge layer, check to see if it looks ok in the middle - if you can see the exposure blend

enter image description here


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.