I ordered a Canon 90D camera, body only. I am looking for suggestions on the best walk around lens for traveling. I like to take landscape and wildlife pictures. I assume I would need two lenses for this. Any suggestions are appreciated.
closed as too broad by Tetsujin, Hueco, mattdm, Michael C, Philip Kendall Sep 9 at 6:49
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
The best general-purpose lens to start with would cover a "normal" focal length. Your camera has a crop sensor, so normal is about 28-35mm.
Resist the temptation to sacrifice image quality or fast apertures for increased focal-length range in zooms.
If you don't want to try random lenses during the next several decades while searching for the "perfect" lens, consider 24-70/2.8 + 70-200/2.8. It would also be reasonable to consider 24-105/4.
If you're a bokeh junkie, you'll probably switch to primes eventually. Consider starting with 35/2 and 50/1.8.
For wildlife, the trend is usually to seek the longest focal lengths possible. Unless you have an urgent need, consider postponing selecting such a lens until after you are more familiar with your equipment. See also wildlife.
Options to consider:
Prime lenses. Consider starting with a "nifty fifty". It may be combined with a wider lens, such as 28mm or 35mm, along with a narrower one, such as 85mm or 135mm.
- Pros: Good image quality. Fast apertures.
- Cons: May have to carry multiple lenses and switch among them often.
Kit lens, usually 18-55/3.5-5.6 (crop sensor).
- Pros: Covers basic focal lengths. Inexpensive. Reasonable image quality.
- Cons: Slow aperture.
Walkabout zoom, includes 18-135/3.5-5.6, 24-105/4.
- Pros: Covers fairly wide range of focal lengths. Not too expensive. Reasonably good image quality.
- Cons: Slow aperture.
Portrait zoom, Tamron SP 35-150/2.8-4.
- Pros: Normal to moderate telephoto range with fast variable aperture.
- Cons: Missing 24-35mm range.
Superzoom, usually 18-200/3.5-6.3 and beyond. One of my favorites was a 28-300/3.5-6.3.
- Pros: Covers every focal length you might ever need. Not too expensive.
- Cons: Usually poor image quality compared with other options. Slow aperture.
Fast, constant-aperture zooms. Common options include 24-70/2.8 and 70-200/2.8. Some APS-C-only lenses fall in this category, such as 17-55/2.8.
- Pros: Covers basic focal lengths. Usually good image quality. Faster aperture than other zoom options.
- Cons: Usually heavier and more expensive than other options.
Mix and match. Use different lenses to cover different focal lengths depending on your preferences.
- Pros: You decide what works best for you.
- Cons: Lots of trial and error. Risk being overcome with GAS. Trying lots of lenses can be expensive.
Not sure you need two lenses at that point. You invested over $1000 in a body without even knowing the kind of lenses you want to use? Tamron has a decent 16-300mm that should cover most uses(*). This lets you travel with one single lens, which has lots of advantages.
One year from now, look at your picture collection, and see which focal lengths you used the most, and use that to start your collection (wide-angle, macro, short prime, long tele...).
(*) Except perhaps real wildlife. But then you don't shoot wildlife when travelling, unless you travel to shoot wildlife, and then bring a lot more gear (tripod, very specific lenses, clothes...). The 16-300 should be enough to shoot the incidental monkey.
While you may need only two lenses given your use cases, you'll want a third lens too, the Nifty Fifty. So, read on:
Wildlife: Canon 55-250mm IS STM. It has to be the STM version as that's significantly better than the non-STM version. Avoid the cheap non-stabilized 75-300mm Canon lenses. I would also say that the 70-300mm lenses aren't worth the additional cost on a crop sensor camera, when compared to Canon 55-250mm. Avoid any cheap third-party 70-300mm zooms. Canon lenses are worth their cost.
Walk-around / travel / landscape: I would pick the Canon 24mm f/2.8 STM. It's very small (thus travel-friendly), has significantly faster aperture than the kit zoom lenses that are often supplied with cameras and very sharp indeed, even at maximum aperture opening. Additionally, the autofocus works perfectly. The drawback is that it won't zoom. However, it's sharp enough that some minor amount of digital zooming with cropping is possible without compromising the quality more than a kit zoom would, so in my opinion the largest problem of this lens is that it won't zoom out rather than it won't zoom in.
If you absolutely need zoom and/or image stabilization, you could consider Canon 15-85mm zoom lens as a travel lens. It's significantly more expensive than 24mm f/2.8 STM, and less sharp (DxOMark says 8 P-Mpix for 15-85mm as opposed to 12 P-Mpix of 24mm f/2.8 STM), yet zooms in and out. However, the aperture is much slower on this lens when compared to 24mm f/2.8 STM.
I won't recommend the Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM due to its high weight, and the autofocus problems that plague this lens. Also, the 17-55mm is not sharp wide open when zoomed to the max. If you buy a fast zoom, you are going to use it wide open and zoom it occasionally in, so not being sharp wide open when fully zoomed in is a genuine problem.
You'll want this too: Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM "Nifty Fifty" / "Plastic Fantastic". It's definitely worth the cost, and allows you to take beautiful portrait pictures. Also, for low light photography, this lens is excellent even though it doesn't have image stabilization.