1

I would like to be able to take images like the ones below, but am a beginner and don't know much about photography.

I was searching for what kind of camera this photographer used, but I didn’t find it. Even though it says Portra 400 on the border, are these actually film?

If I wanted to take images like these, what equipment would I need and what resources should I look for to begin learning?

--Thanks from Paris

enter image description here

  • 2
    What do you love so much about these images? If you want to replicate this "look" (and I don't really know what that means), I don't think just using the same medium format film camera is the solution. – osullic May 7 at 12:46
  • 2
    Everyone please remember the Code of Conduct. – Philip Kendall May 7 at 15:15
  • 3
    @JeanKacey What exactly is it about these images that you wish to replicate? The importance of the camera, lens, and film varies with your objectives. What you want might be doable digitally. Or it may be an artifact of the digitization process. – xiota May 7 at 22:36
  • 3
    @xiota Where in the site guidelines does it say that only images you think are worth saving can be used to validate a "how do I do this" type of question? The OP obviously sees something in these images they wish to imitate. Just because you don't personally find them artistically pleasing does not invalidate the question nor does it mean others may not find it artistically significant. – Michael C May 8 at 7:41
  • 2
    PLEASE edit the title into something which describes these images specifically. Imagine how many completely different photographs could share this same title. – mattdm May 11 at 14:29
1

I just want to be near this result because I really love this kind of picture

What exactly is it about these images that you "love"? The importance of the camera, lens, and film varies with your objectives. What you want might be doable digitally. Or it may be an artifact of the digitization process.

I'm not photographer & I don’t know the exact terms

You should learn general photography first. As you acquire the vocabulary and knowledge needed to adequately describe what you like about these images, you will likely also gain the skills needed to reproduce them.

  1. Get a digital camera. Consider mirrorless with a kit lens and nifty fifty to start. You can get a previous-generation model fairly inexpensively.

  2. Read the camera manual. For every setting described in the manual, go out and take pictures using those settings.

  3. Read a general photography book. Consider visiting a library and flipping through several different books. Look for one that focuses more on photographic content and techniques than technology. Many books about "digital" photography waste too many pages describing out-dated technology that is found in the camera manual or Wikipedia.

  4. Apply concepts you read about to the images you take.

  5. Examine your pictures for how you'd like to improve them.

  6. Keep taking pictures and learning new concepts.

  7. After learning the "basics" on digital, consider switching to film, if that is the path you'd like to take.

I was searching for what kind of camera this photographer used...

Without asking the photographer, it is unlikely the specific camera can be identified. Though, as others have stated, it is possible to identify properties of the camera that was likely used.

Similarly, the photographer would likely have to be asked about the specific lens used. However, someone who is very familiar with the characteristics of a wide range of lenses may be able to identify properties of the lens beyond focal length and max aperture. For instance, the bokeh of some lenses, such as Cooke triplets and Sonnar, are distinctive.

Even though it says Portra 400 on the border, are these actually film?

It's reasonable to expect that these were taken on film because artifacts typical of film are present. However, someone with great attention to detail could replicate them digitally.


Consider getting some Portra 400 film. Throw it in a camera with a decent light meter and lens. No need for medium format, if that's not an essential aspect of what you're after. I'd try something like a Canon T50/T70 with FD 50/1.8 lens in Program mode because they're readily available, inexpensive, easy to use, and produce good results.

Photograph a subject with a limited range of colors on an overcast day. Take the film to a local lab for development. Show them the sample images so they know not to bump the contrast and saturation when making the prints.

0

I don’t know if it’s with camera film

Well, in an era of special effects these images can be faked, you could compose an image and add some elements of old photos, the frame, the tones, the noise.

I was searching

An investigation includes the date of the images. For example, Are the buildings of a known city with a clear skyline that is now transformed? Are the images from a known actor of the 80s? of the 70s? Then, there is a chance to find out which model of cameras was commonly used.

More importantly, this would exclude (mostly) the usage of a digital camera and confirm the photo was made by a film camera.

Can you find the name and the biography of the photographer? This will probably give you the best answer, you probably can even contact him.


But in the end, it does not matter to be that specific. Let us assume it is really a contact sheet from a film camera.

For next time i can deduce from myself

The answer, in general, is "study".

For example. First of all, it is a medium format film camera.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_format

Which is a subset of the more general history of photography.

https://www.google.com/search?q=history+of+photography


But you are losing yourself. You are not the police solving a cold case.

What you need to focus on is on what do you like, the surrounding, the clothing... But My guess is that it is more about the posing, the mood, the nostalgic feeling.

Yes, there are a couple of specific technical aspects you do should focus on.

Lenses, focal length and aperture. Google that, search on the forum.

And probably some color grading on postproduction.

Study that.

But again, focus on the mood, on the posing, on the relationship with the subject. Focus on that, forget "the camera". (Well, do not forget to actually bring the camera)

  • Kodak Portra was introduced in the late 1990s, so if this is a "known actor of the 70s or 80s" that would be quite odd. – mattdm May 11 at 16:15
0

Though it is possible to add negative borders to digital images, I'm going to assume that these are scans of film and that you are wanting to get into film photography...


On Equipment

The image ratio on these appears to be 6x7, which is the largest "normal" size for medium format cameras using 120 size film. (There are panoramic cameras that use 120 to shoot some very wide shots)

Example cameras that shoot the 6x7 format are the Mamiya RB67, Pentax 67, and Fujifilm GF670. This list is by no means exhaustive.

Additionally, other medium format cameras use the same film but shoot other ratios, such as 6x6 and 6x4.5. Since they all use the same role of film, the number of frames you'll get per roll is highest with 6x4.5 and smallest with 6x7.

Example 6x6 cameras include the Hasselblad 500 and Rolleiflex.

Example 6x4.5 cameras include the Pentax 645 and Mamiya 645

Something to note is that many of these cameras have swappable backs, or swappable film containers. It is very possible to use a 6x4.5 back on a 6x7 camera (if the gear exists) but it is not possible to use a 6x7 back on a 6x4.5 camera.

So, if you wanted the equipment to pull off these exact shots...exactly...you'd need to look for a medium format 6x7 camera. If you wanted to be in the ballpark, you could go with a medium format 6x6 or 6x4.5 camera.

Keep in mind that, because of the size of the negative is bigger, the whole camera system is bigger than perhaps anything you're used to. If this is a deterrent, but you still want to shoot film, then look for any of the plethora of 35mm (135 film) SLR's or rangefinders on the market.

I don't believe any of these are made new anymore, but they come cheap on the used market. Keep in mind that you'll also need lenses - which matter far more for the shot than the camera. A 75mm or 90mm lens is good to get you started, and once you have some experience, you can decide if you need a wider or more telephoto lens.


On Learning

The worst thing you can do in photography is screw up your exposure (well, maybe not the worst but it's up there). These images were all taken on a cloudy day and the exposures look good, with the exception of the blown sky in the last. No additional lights/flashes appear to be in use.

So, you can easily take images like these, assuming you have the camera, some Portra 400, a cloudy day, and a model.

Since exposure is so critical, and since many of these older cameras don't have any automatic functions whatsoever, you need to begin your journey by learning about exposure.

You can then further learn about composition, depth of field, angle of view, light modifiers and mixed lighting and strobe only lighting. If you want to begin shooting black and white film, you should also learn to develop it at home. There are even more topics than these, but even just exposure and composition are enough to get you started and continue learning for a bit.

  • Note that the aspect ratio of 6x7 format is 4:5 (aka 8:10), not actually 6:7. (And these images are indeed in 4:5.) Nothing you say is wrong — I just would like to see that spelled out so as to not accidentally perpetuate confusion. – mattdm May 11 at 14:34
0

The film is 120 and the size is 6x7. There was only a limited range of cameras ever made in this format.

As the shots seem to be hand held & shot from eye level my best guess is they were taken with Pentax 6x7.

The other major 6x7 camera (Mamyia RB) is normally associated with studio / tripod work (it was dubbed the truss strainer as it weights a ton).

The normal focal length for 6x7 format is 105 mm and the images seem consistent with a normal lens. So my guesstimate is Takumar 105/2.4, which is a sweet lens.

  • I dunno - I kind of like taking my rb out and about...my biceps have never looked better – Hueco May 11 at 14:30
  • Note that the aspect ratio of 6x7 format is 4:5 (aka 8:10), not actually 6:7. (And these images are indeed in 4:5.) Nothing you say is wrong — I just would like to see that spelled out so as to not accidentally perpetuate confusion. – mattdm May 11 at 14:34
  • @Hueco you obviously get my meaning 🙂 a handheld RB is a real man's camera. With a prism and a couple lens doubly so. Pantywaists like me stick to 645 format. – Jindra Lacko May 11 at 14:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.