3

There's the sunny f/16 rule that says photographs on a sunny day should use f/16 with the exposure time set to reciprocal of the ISO sensitivity.

However, there's also looney f/11 rule that says photographs of the moon should use f/11 with the exposure time set to reciprocal of the ISO sensitivity. Seems about right (f/11, ISO 100, 1/100 s exposure, 250mm focal length on 1.6x crop sensor, image stabilization on):

picture of the moon during daytime

At first, I thought photographing the moon should use significantly longer exposure time and a big aperture to collect as much light as possible, especially if done during the night.

However, when you think about it, the moon is actually lit by the sun! Thus, the sunny f/16 rule should apply also to photographing the moon.

However, it doesn't. The f/11 collects 2.1 times as much light as f/16.

My question is, why the 2.1x difference? It can't be due to the atmosphere of the Earth, as the light coming directly from the sun and also the light being scattered by the moon travel the same amount in the Earth's atmosphere.

  • In this day and age, using f/16 for anything is only a good idea if there is a concrete reason to use f/16. It is not a great choice for general purpose work, due to diffraction and sensor dirt. – rackandboneman Feb 18 at 9:14
4

The moon's surface is relatively darker than Earth's, with an average albedo of 11% (our gray cards are 18%). Moon phases other than full moon are side lighted, and darker still. Yet we seem to prefer too-bright pictures of the moon, thinking that captures it shining up there against the black sky background. So f/11 more nearly captures that sensation for us.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.