I recently bought a Canon 50mm f1.8 for my Canon 1000d. But, I find that the images are not as sharp as those I saw in the reviews or any other images taken using other cameras like the 550d and above. I shot in Raw as well as JPEG L ("fine" quality).

Does the lens produce different quality images depending on the camera used?

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ You could add some reference image here so we can see whether image softness is something usual or is it extraordinary in case of your lens. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 4, 2011 at 9:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks Evan and Labnut... I actually shot it at 1.8 and indoor.. Will try shooting outdoors and at f2 and above. \$\endgroup\$
    – PRK
    Commented Apr 5, 2011 at 3:27

2 Answers 2


To an extent, yes. There are several ways in which the camera body can affect sharpness and image quality in general:


If your camera's autofocus is inaccurate, your subject might just be slightly out of focus, causing a loss of focus. The 550d has a cross-type center AF point which can focus more accurately with lenses faster than f/2.8; as far as I can tell, the 1000d lacks this.


The 550d is an 18 megapixel camera, almost twice the 10.1 megapixels you have. This means it (theoretically) can resolve about 34% smaller details than the 1000d. Generally, primes are sharp, so the limiting factor may in fact be the camera. Sometimes, the camera can out-resolve the lens, so a higher megapixel camera won't have as much of an effect on image sharpness.

Noise and Noise reduction

High-ISO noise and noise reduction can also destroy a lot of detail. The 550d has an ISO range of 100-6400, compared to the 1000d's 100-1600. At the same ISO, I would expect that the 550d has much lower noise, meaning less detail-destroying noise reduction needs to be applied to the image.

Camera shake/Motion blur

Another benefit of having a camera capable of high ISOs is the ability to increase shutter speed. The 1000d may be able to produce a reasonably low-noise picture at ISO 1600, while you have to shoot at ISO 800 or ISO 400 to produce similar results. This means you'll have to decrease shutter speed to compensate if you want to keep aperture the same. Slower shutter speed = more motion blur, either by camera shake or from subject motion. A tripod can help you avoid camera shake, but won't keep your subject steady.

Some other considerations:

Keep in mind that lenses are generally sharpest when stopped down a bit — Wide open, some of the light has to bend at hard angles; stopped too far down, and you hit the diffraction limit. It appears that your lens is sharpest at about f/4.5. Also, a lot of the example images you find in reviews are shot outside, under daylight. A hard light source like the sun will give you sharp shadows and lots of contrast; this makes for a sharper-looking image.

  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Additionally camera shake is a frequent cause of soft images. \$\endgroup\$
    – labnut
    Commented Apr 4, 2011 at 7:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ In addition to Evan's answer I would like to stress the importance of the subject distance, because it affects the total Depth of Field which then affects the overall image focus. Try setting the lens to Hyperfocal distance when comparing different bodies for the same lens. P.S. This would be a comment, but I don't have enough points to add comments... \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 4, 2011 at 11:52
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Another good reference is www.slrgear.com, which I actually prefer - (slrgear.com/reviews/zproducts/canon50f18/tloader.htm). It shows that the edges are very soft at f1.8 (7 to 8 Blur Units) and f2.0. This might be the source of @PRK's impressions. The lens sharpens markedly at f2.8 and becomes excellent from f4.0 (1 to 2 Blur Units). \$\endgroup\$
    – labnut
    Commented Apr 4, 2011 at 12:31

DXO does lens tests on most camera bodies and offers different scores for each.


Your 1000D is basically a 400D which gets a 13 compared to the 25 on the canon mark 3.

However, prime lenses are excellent performance wise....99% of the problem is the shooter if it's a prime lens.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The 1000D is basically a 400D? What is that supposed to mean? And what is the numbers you've assigned to them. And what is a "canon mark 3". Very confusing answer that doesn't explain much. \$\endgroup\$
    – Hugo
    Commented Sep 26, 2015 at 8:52
  • \$\begingroup\$ 1000D isn't tested on that site...the 1000D is a lower end variant of the 400D so I used it instead. Canon Mark III is one of Canon's flagship full frame cameras. DXO does extensive tests of lens and assigns a composite score based on it's tests PER camera body/lens match. \$\endgroup\$
    – deek
    Commented Sep 27, 2015 at 22:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ Then you'll have to write that. Otherwise people won't get what you're trying to say. And the "canon mark 3" is called "Canon 5D mark 3". Also you'll have to explain why the composite score is relevant (hint they are not: https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/48199/how-relevant-are-the-dxomark-scores-and-tests \$\endgroup\$
    – Hugo
    Commented Sep 28, 2015 at 3:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.