I noticed than the Standard preset of colors of my monitor produce more vivid colors than Adobe RGB preset. As far as I know, the monitor can reproduce both sRGB and Adobe RGB. Thought that the Adobe RGB should be the wider gamut that the monitor could reproduce.

I also noticed that Adobe RGB preset look brigther than the standard one

Could someone clarify that to me?

  • \$\begingroup\$ Wouldn't sRGB and Adobe RGB fit within the monitors gamut, assuming they assert it can reproduce both accurately? This implies the native gamut is wider than both. That is, both of those "triangles" would fit within the decidedly non-triangular gamut response of the monitor itself. \$\endgroup\$
    – user31502
    Commented Feb 12, 2019 at 21:58

2 Answers 2


It's hard to say what the 'Standard' setting is supposed to do on each particular monitor. From my experience with similar monitors, where there are 'actually standard' presets like sRGB or AdobeRGB and then some others, the Default or Standard preset can be one of two things:

  • The 'native' display, without any built-in corrections.
  • The 'best looking' setting.

The first one is preferable (unless there is a special Native or User setting): you can use it for your own calibration (with a colorimeter). The latter is more common, and from what you are describing, yours is like that. No wonder 'best looking' for a typical consumer means oversaturated.

It is common for people doing their first colour calibration to complain that the calibration made things 'worse': duller colours, yellow cast, etc. But one should remember that the point of calibration (or standard presets, i.e. factory calibration) is not to make display 'better' (in a common sense), but rather to make it accurate and consistent.

There is one more thing. According to specs, your monitor is a wide gamut one (99% AdobeRGB). Such monitors require colour management: most content you find was (and still is being) created for sRGB*. If you view a 'normal' (sRGB) photo on your monitor (in it's native setting) without doing anything, it will appear oversaturated and (likely) with some magenta cast. So there are three ways you can (and should) approach this situation.

  • 'Dumb down' your monitor by selecting the sRGB preset. This is the easiest way - you don't need to do anything else - but is least desirable. Still, in some cases this is a valid approach. For example, most video editing software (and players) don't do output colour correction, and for them switching the monitor to their intended profile (Rec. 709 in this case rather than sRGB) is the only way.
  • Get a colorimeter, set the monitor to its native preset and do a full colour calibration. Follow the colorimeter software guide.
  • Without a colorimeter, you have to trust your manufacturer's factory calibration. For your (fairly decent mid-range) monitor this is reasonable, at least while it's new. Given that your monitor is closest to AdobeRGB in its native coverage, choose the AdobeRGB preset and then (important!) go to your OS colour setting and tell it to use the AdobeRGB ICC (ICM) profile as your monitor profile. (All modern OS will include this profile amongst their starndard set). Alternatively, your monitor may come with a stock colour profile in its software package. You could install it, but double check which exactly monitor preset it's related to. If you can't find this info, don't trust it and use AdobeRGB.

I can't stress the importance of correct software setting enough. Without it (unless you follow the first approach), everything will certainly look wrong, and you would be better off with a cheaper standard monitor. You need to make your software aware of the capabilities of your monitor (remember they are not the most common ones!) by selecting the appropriate colour profile. This also applies if you change the preset on your monitor: by doing that, you effectively change your monitor!

The good news is that in most cases it is enough to set the OS right, and the applications will use this setting. But still, some software disregard the OS settings and have their own, while some just don't colour manage. Some do manage, but only if the image has an explicitly attached profile. It's hard to be sure, esp. on Windows, and you need to check and trust each app to do the right thing. There is still no common mindset that colour management absolutely must be done. (Mac is much better in this regard, but I can't say if it's perfect).

As for brightness, this is (theoretically) an independent setting from colours. You can have, say, AdobeRGB at different brightness levels. However, in practice changing the brightness may shift colours a bit; this is why proper colour calibration (including factory presets) includes brightness and contrast in its target, and once calibrated, fixes them. But if you find your AdobeRGB preset brightness uncomfortable, you have no choice but to manually adjust it and hope the distortion will be negligible. This is if your monitor even allows you to change brightness for such preset: many professional monitors simply don't, and you need to re-calibrate for each brightness.

(*) Or rather, more often than not without any colour management, but on a sRGB-like equipment.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Well, I didn't find a Adobe RGB ICC profie on color management window on Windows 10. But I downloaded it on Adobe's website. Is it ok or Windows should have the Adobe RGB Profile? \$\endgroup\$
    – lelukas
    Commented Feb 12, 2019 at 21:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ In fact, the monitor does installed a profile called Dell UP2516D Color Profile D6500. But, if I get what you explained right, I should use it only if I choose the standard preset, as I noticed some changes between starndard color space and Adobe RGB one, right? \$\endgroup\$
    – lelukas
    Commented Feb 12, 2019 at 21:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ I don't know. This is the problem: a colour profile is only valid for one particular preset. The manual or perhaps some readme.txt should explicitly say which preset this profile is intended for. If it doesn't say, maybe it's the Standard, but I wouldn't risk it: having a wrong profile is no better than having none. With AdobeRGB, you at least have this knowledge, and it's supposedly close to the native capabilities of the monitor. \$\endgroup\$
    – Zeus
    Commented Feb 13, 2019 at 2:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ @lelukas, In addition, if Dell claims a preset as AdobeRGB, they thereby declare adherence to a known standard. Whereas the 'Standard' preset may vary between the copies, nobody is responsible. Yet I bet they don't generate a profile for each monitor; they just have a stock one for the model. At best, they massage the preset to conform to this profile, but again, it's hard to know unless they explicitly say it. \$\endgroup\$
    – Zeus
    Commented Feb 13, 2019 at 2:59

You have to be careful that the monitor settings match the color space that your software is trying to display. If the software is configured for Adobe RGB but the display is sRGB, it will look muted. If the software is set to sRGB but the display is Adobe RGB, the colors will be overly vibrant.

This is because the overall color space gamut will be encoded into the same range of numbers, typically 0-255. In Adobe RGB 255 will be a much more intense color than 255 in sRGB, simply because sRGB doesn't need to reach as far.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.