Is there a way to shift all the adjustments made (color, tint, contrast...) during post-processing of photos in Lightroom with an uncalibrated monitor by some offset value after calibrating the monitor? If there isn't, would it mean that after calibrating my monitor, I would have to re-edit each photo to look how it was when viewed on an uncalibrated monitor?

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Shifting by the same amount will sometimes, but not always, give the results you seem to expect. A lot has to do with how full the spectrum was of the lighting used when the shot was taken. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented Feb 5, 2019 at 18:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ Not to mention you need to take into account who is going to be seeing these images, and on what devices. Since you can't often control the second very well, some compromises will have to be made. \$\endgroup\$
    – user31502
    Commented Feb 5, 2019 at 20:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ Just to add, another reason why I would want to "shift" by bulk the adjustments made is because I would like to print out a lot of my photos that were taken and processed even before monitor calibration \$\endgroup\$
    – user71128
    Commented Feb 6, 2019 at 11:14
  • \$\begingroup\$ I had an old CTR monitor that was all magenta. Can you edit the photos for that uncalibrated monitor too? There was a drunk man driving on the highway and he listened on the radio "there is a mad man driving on the highway in the wrong direction" "And he said, One? there are many! You can not adjust a photo for an "uncalibrated monitor" unless it is only one and a very specific one. \$\endgroup\$
    – Rafael
    Commented Nov 5, 2019 at 17:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ You could try a couple of them for grins an chuckles. If the amount of correction is the same, try applying the same correction to a larger sample. I have my doubts as to whether this will work as your uncalibrated monitor is adrift free from any known standard for reference. Even colour managed systems require warm-up time for stabilization, for one example of tight control. \$\endgroup\$
    – Stan
    Commented Nov 5, 2019 at 17:48

1 Answer 1


I can only give a very limited answer which would apply if I had such a problem. I'll only describe the general approach: I don't have user-ready solutions.

First case: all photos are in RAW and are simply processed from there, without further editing. In this case we should aim to re-generate them instead of editing the processed jpegs.

In addition, it helps if it's raw-raw, like Canon's CR2 or Sony's ARW, etc. In this case you'll have an XMP file beside your raw file after editing. This is a text file which we can batch edit.

If it's DNG, it's still possible to extract XMP from it using exiftool. (Normally XMP gets embedded into DNG after editing. I personally hate that any software touches my source files, so in my workflow I always extract XMP from DNGs and then restore DNGs to their in-camera state). If you work with DNG, you'll have two more steps: extract XMP and then at the end (optionally) embed it back.

Anyway, now you need to write a script that modifies XMPs. This depends on your tools; in the simplest case you can just replace the required settings like crs:GreenHue="0" to crs:GreenHue="+3". Normally though you'll want to read the setting, interpret the number and increment it as needed. Perl or awk can do it; or you can employ a proper XML parser.

Which XMP seetting do you need? They are fairly self-descriptive, but to be sure, choose a sample photo, save its original XMP, edit the photo, save, and compare the difference between the original and the new XMPs.

Of course, back up your original XMPs! Then having done the mass replacement, mass process your RAWs as usual.

Second case: need to modify the processed jpegs. For that, I would write a Photoshop action. Of course, this applies if you use Photoshop.

This is quite simple: you can record an action from your manual manipulations on a sample image, make sure you save the result, and then you can easily run this action on your directory recursively.

Again, given that the modification on jpeg is destructive, you should back up everything; if you don't like the result on some of the photos, it's better to get the original and re-apply other corrections on it, rather than to add more corrections on the result.

Addendum: how to see the calibration (correction curves)

The 'perfect' solution is to apply 'opposite' curves to each image (for each primary colour) to the correction curves created by the colorimeter. (Assuming you had no correction before). This can be done with either of the above ways, but (usually) involves more than just 'one number' fix. Still, very doable. XMPs have the correction table*, and of course Photoshop has the Curves effect. The question is, how to get the calibration curves.

Professional versions of the calibration software usually allow you to see the applied correction curves. But not all, and not always conveniently.

So what we can do is to use independent software. The goal is to parse the ICC (ICM) profile created by your supplied software (Spyder etc.) and read its 1-D LUT correction tables (the VCGT tag if I remember correctly). There are probably tools to do this specifically, but I'm not familiar with them. What I can suggest however is this.

Download the free DisplayCAL (and ArgyllCMS, it will tell you to). There in the menu select File -> Profile Information and load your ICM. At the top select Calibration curves. You'll see the correction being applied.

DisplayCAL calibration display

Most likely, the curves will be quite non-linear and different for each colour, like on this picture**. I don't think you can export it as a table, but you can see the numbers on the screen below. Taking 3-4 points should suffice. You see in the example that Red 206 is boosted to 216: you'll need to make it 196. (This is not precisely so, but is OK in practice unless corrections are extreme).

Having this data is useful even if you decide to do manual or small-batch corrections: you know precisely what correction you should do.

(You may also find that DisplayCAL is a much better software overall for your colour calibration than the supplied Datacolor's. I can't vouch for it as I use monitor-specific software, but it's worth giving it a try).

(*) The difficulty may be that the table may already be used, whether by your manual corrections or by the embedded non-linear contrast curves. In this case you'd need to superimpose existing correction with yours, which is not trivial. Whereas with Photoshop or any decent editing software, you can apply many curves on top of each other.

(**) This is for a cheap office LCD monitor - but after maximum colour adjustment has been done in its OSD menu.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for your answer! I was also wondering if it is also possible to "open up" the newly generated monitor profile to see which parameters (like green hues, contrast...) were shifted and by how much from the original monitor profile so I know which setting in the XMP file I would be shifting and by how much. Thanks! \$\endgroup\$
    – user71128
    Commented Feb 6, 2019 at 11:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ Did you use a hardware colour calibrator? Most calibration software that come with colorimeters I used can show you the correction curves. I'm not sure they can export them, but at least you can see which corrections are made. However, don't confuse calibration with colour profiles! Calibration (which you are interested in) tries to adjust the response curves to make the output grey-neutral and gamma-correct across all levels. The adjustment is loaded into LUT of the video card or (ideally) the monitor itself. ICC then describes the measured corrected output. \$\endgroup\$
    – Zeus
    Commented Feb 6, 2019 at 23:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes I did, I think it was a Spyder5 colorimeter, but I didn't notice any "values" being displayed after calibration. It created another ICC profile though, which I don't really have an idea of how it works. \$\endgroup\$
    – user71128
    Commented Feb 7, 2019 at 13:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ Spyder comes with different flavours of software... OK, if you want to go through such a path, you may need an additional tool. Check the Addendum to my answer. \$\endgroup\$
    – Zeus
    Commented Feb 8, 2019 at 1:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.