Mechanical mount adapters for mirrorless cameras, like MD or FD mount to NEX/E mount or Fuji X, do not feature any feedback about the aperture set on the lens, nor any camera control about the (mechanically controlled) aperture.

Is the former because no one has bothered to integrate a potentiometer and microcontroller to translate the mechanical positions to the proper electrical protocols... or do common mirrorless cameras not have the ability to accept aperture information coming from the lens side of the mount at all?

  • \$\begingroup\$ Even if the pathway existed the FD lenses do not have the Brain containing the information to send along the pathway through to the camera \$\endgroup\$
    – Alaska Man
    Commented Dec 4, 2018 at 11:29
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Yes, but the information is available from the lens, albeit as mechanical, angular displacement, so the brains could be put into the adapter. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 4, 2018 at 11:41
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Theoretically possible != economically viable \$\endgroup\$
    – Caleb
    Commented Dec 4, 2018 at 13:33

1 Answer 1


It is certainly theoretically possible, at least with the mechanical designs of some older lens mounts, particularly with the relatively large amount of space afforded by adapting lenses with 40+ millimeter registration distances to cameras with 20mm or less registration distances.

The most likely reason we haven't seen any¹ is that there is no real market demand for such a device. I can think of several factors that might be in play:

  • Using older manual focus lens mounts means the user is already giving up autofocus. This usually also means they're using such lenses is a way that allows plenty of time to set up a shot. (No one is using adapted manual focus lenses to shoot sports action for hire.)
  • Most of those shooters comfortable with focusing manually are also comfortable setting exposure manually. They're happy to use either an external light meter, or to dial in exposure by taking test shots and using the histogram to adjust for the next shot.
  • One of the main motivations for using older lenses on newer cameras is to lower costs as much as possible. Lenses in older, pre-AF mounts tend to be cheap and plentiful. Simple mechanical adapters are cheaper than would be the case for complex mechanical adapters that would measure a mechanical position of a pin/lever and translate that to an electrical communication to the camera body.

¹ For all I know, such a thing may actually exist somewhere. But if they do, they're not widespread or well known.

  • \$\begingroup\$ What might be missed even by these shooters (I certainly do): In-viewfinder aperture number display and EXIF data :) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 4, 2018 at 23:08
  • \$\begingroup\$ @rackandboneman Yet apparently not enough to create market demand for such an adapter. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented Dec 6, 2018 at 1:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.