How does Picasa decide how to process RAW photos? When I shoot in RAW+JPEG the two pictures can look dramatically different. Is it just converting the RAW files upon import, or is post-processing still possible in the application?

  • \$\begingroup\$ Excellent question. I've always wondered! Thanks for asking :) \$\endgroup\$
    – AJ Finch
    Commented Jul 22, 2010 at 9:34
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I found more information about Picasa's RAW processing, particularly that it uses Dcraw on the back-end. One of the consequences of this processing is that Picasa always normalizes the exposure of your RAW photos so that 1% of the pixels are white. \$\endgroup\$
    – JoeGaggler
    Commented Aug 15, 2010 at 6:39

3 Answers 3


I don't know all the technical details of how Picasa handles RAW files, but my short answer would be: "Dont even bother". There's a good blog post on using Picasa with RAW files.
Unfortunately the conclusion is that it's pretty much useless. Picasa is a photo management app with basic editing and sharing functionality not a RAW post-processor. Even Google makes it pretty clear. Here's a quote from Google Photos Blog:

Although Picasa’s RAW support will do a great job of helping you organize and share RAW-formatted files on your computer, Picasa doesn’t support super-sophisticated editing of RAW files. For this, you’ll need to use either the software that came with your camera, or purchase advanced photo-editing applications, like Aperture or Lightroom.

Don't get me wrong. There is nothing wrong with Picasa. It's very good at what it's made for. I use it all the time for basic JPEG editing and uploading baby snapshots to share with family, but when I need to process some RAW files I'll always go to Capture NX or Lightroom (one day when I figure out how to handle colors in Nikon's RAW files).

  • \$\begingroup\$ It's also incredibly damn slow. Processing a raw file takes orders of magnitude longer than Bibble (seriously), and when I start it up to deal with one photo, it takes it upon itself to churn and churn digging around my entire system indexing other photos. Bah! \$\endgroup\$
    – Reid
    Commented Jul 22, 2010 at 13:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Reid - Picasa is not intended to just process one photo: it is a photo management application and so just using it to process one pic is not going to be an efficient workflow. Once it has found all your pictures it does a great job at photo management (best free option IMO), although I would recommend turning off raw as a recognised type and converting them to JPEG/TIFF/PNG with something else. \$\endgroup\$
    – danio
    Commented Jul 22, 2010 at 16:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ I use Picasa when I'm out with my laptop and don't have access to my real software at home. If there were trivial changes in the user experience (e.g., ask before starting an extremely time-consuming indexing operation, or, gasp, let me cancel it, both standard user interface techniques) it would be perfectly adequate for this role. \$\endgroup\$
    – Reid
    Commented Jul 22, 2010 at 16:33

First of all, it sounds like you are comparing Picasa with your camera's JPEG generator, so I'll talk about what your camera does first, and the I'll talk more about how Picasa works.

A typical camera will take an image on the sensor, and it'll be some kind of a RAW image. As it takes an insane amount of time to write an image out, most of the time the conversion to JPEG is done using a specialty chip that handles the conversion. They typically have a few settings, like sharpness, contrast, white balance, etc, but the control is fairly minimal, and you're stuck with whatever comes out the other end.

Picasa will do some preliminary processing on all RAW images upon import. Picasa, like most serious photo editors, doesn't actually change the RAW image directly, instead, it contains a sidecar file that lists the changes that have been done. There are a few exceptions with Picasa, namely when you do spot removal, or red-eye removal, a JPEG is created, but otherwise, the only changes occur in a sidecar file.

What Picasa does out of the box isn't completely clear, but it is clear that it does some kind of auto contrasting. I've noticed that when I've used it, the highlights are almost always over exposed, where in camera or using Lightroom, I don't see the same problem. Of course, you can fiddle some with the dials to try and improve the performance, with limited success.

Picasa, for it's price, is a great program, but like most things, you get what you pay for. I do recommend it as a whole to a beginning photographer, but if you're the type to spend hundreds on a camera or lens, you should consider a few hundred to get a better post processing program.


If you're a perfectionist and have a good eye for extreme detail and have plenty of time, then shoot in raw. If you take a reasonable photo to start with, Picasa does a half decent job with JPG.

To sum up raw contains every detail shot and you have to edit what's what: dodge and burn brightness contrast etc. With JPG your camera is programmed to works out what it judges to be a good photo. JPG also loses a certain amount of detail


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.