Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 17, 2020 at 5:49 comment added IMil @MichaelC well there's a thin line between a monopoly brand and a generic word. I am positive that "Aeroflot" wasn't treated as a generic word for an airline, but I wasn't much of an amateur photographer in the Soviet era, so can't be sure whether Rubinar made the grade. What makes me doubt this is that despite Rubinar being the only photographic lens of the type, mirror lenses were (and are) widely used in telescopes, named differently.
Feb 17, 2020 at 5:34 comment added Michael C @IMil I suppose you insist that Kleenex and facial tissue aren't the same thing, either? "Aeroflot" may not be a generic Russian language word for airline, but in the USSR, there was only one Soviet based airline and it was Aeroflot, so Aeroflot was THE Russian airline. Similarly, Rubinar was THE Soviet mirror lens.
Feb 17, 2020 at 4:51 comment added IMil @MichaelC not exactly. Rubinar is just a brand name of Soviet mirror lenses. USSR being USSR, there were no other brands, but this doesn't make it a generic Russian word, just like "Aeroflot" doesn't mean "an airline".
Sep 25, 2018 at 11:37 comment added rackandboneman @xiota "usually considered undesirable" is almost an opposite to "always undesirable" in art :)
Jun 30, 2018 at 21:01 comment added Michael C @JindraLacko Rubinar is basically an English transliteration of the Russian word for "mirror lens."
Jun 30, 2018 at 13:27 comment added Jindra Lacko Yup, quite often. Do a quick search for "bokeh rubinar" (a commonly used catadioptric lens) on Flickr to see what I mean...
Jun 30, 2018 at 12:26 comment added xiota The ring/donut shape bokeh is usually considered undesirable. Would someone try to create it intentionally, as you describe?
Jun 30, 2018 at 11:03 history answered Jindra Lacko CC BY-SA 4.0